None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of laryngeal mask placement techniques on respiratory dynamics, ease of device placement, device placement time, hemodynamic parameters and complications. For this purpose, we have three groups. we will insert pro-Seal laryngeal mask either with classic way, with laryngoscope or with the help of video laryngoscope . We will use briacombe scoring system to assess the position of laryngeal mask airway devices.
Interventions
The anesthesiologist will administer the intervention which will approximately last about 20-60 seconds. After induction and insertion of pro-Seal laryngeal mask either in a classic way, with a laryngoscope or with the help of video laryngoscope volume-controlled ventilation mode will be set. We will record the respiratory dynamics, heartbeat, systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressures every 5 minutes during surgery. We will record the laryngeal mask insertion time and oropharyngeal leakage pressure. We will evaluate the placement of a laryngeal mask according to young criteria. The development and severity of coughing, retching, laryngospasm, extremity, and head movement during laryngeal mask placement will be recorded. Bloodstains, sore throat, hoarseness will be recorded on the mask that may develop due to laryngeal mask placement. We will use the Briacombe scoring system to assess the position of laryngeal mask airway devices.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
120 patients elective minor urological surgery 18-65 years ASA Physical Status Classification System 1- 3
Exclusion criteria
patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with gastric regurgitation, previous jaw surgery, body mass index more than 40 and patients with pulmonary infections