Skip to content

What is the effect of passive movements on joint stiffness in intensive care unit patients?

Investigating the effect of passive movements on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion in intensive care unit patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12620001202954
Enrollment
25
Registered
2020-11-12
Start date
2021-02-17
Completion date
2023-01-25
Last updated
2024-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to investigate whether passive movements prevent or reduce joint stiffness in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. It is believed that ICU patients, particularly longer-term patients, are at risk of developing joint stiffness because of their critical illness, and the management thereof, and immobility which prevents them from moving their limbs in a normal way. The development of joint stiffness has the potential to adversely affect functional ability and health-related quality of life. For this reason, physiotherapists often carry out passive movements on ICU patients, particularly longer-term ICU patients, with the aim of preventing or reducing joint stiffness. However, to date, there is little evidence to support or refute this practice. The primary aim of this within-participant study is to measure the effect of passive movements on joint range of motion (ROM) for longer-term ICU patients. The within-participant design of the study means that each participant will act as their own control, with one side of their body randomly allocated to receive the intervention (i.e. passive movements) and the other side to receive no intervention (i.e. control).

Interventions

For the purposes of this study, the intervention for the side of the body allocated to receive passive movements will involve the treating intensive care unit (ICU) physiotherapist moving the participant’s elbow and ankle joints through a full range of motion. These two joints were selected for the intervention based on previous research and our own anecdotal experience in ICU regarding which joints seem to get stiff most frequently, and the ease of measurement of range of motion. The intensity,

For the purposes of this study, the intervention for the side of the body allocated to receive passive movements will involve the treating intensive care unit (ICU) physiotherapist moving the participant’s elbow and ankle joints through a full range of motion. These two joints were selected for the intervention based on previous research and our own anecdotal experience in ICU regarding which joints seem to get stiff most frequently, and the ease of measurement of range of motion. The intensity, frequency and duration of the intervention, as follows, is based on a treatment protocol used in a previous published study and survey responses reported previously. We elected to use a relatively intensive passive movement regimen as we want to maximise the likelihood of finding a treatment effect. Passive movements will be given to the elbow and ankle joints on the allocated side for 10 minutes each in the morning and afternoon, five days per week (weekdays). It is anticipated that participants will require the intervention for at least a two week period, though there is no mandatory minimum intervention duration. The intervention for the ankle joint will involve dorsiflexion (with knee in extension and flexion), plantarflexion, inversion and eversion through the available range of motion. For the elbow joint the intervention will involve flexion, extension, pronation and supination through the available range of motion. No force will be used at the end of joint range. As per usual clinical practice, no specific advice will be given to the treating physiotherapists regarding cadence of movements. Adherence with the provision of this intervention will be recorded on a purpose-designed form. In keeping with usual clinical practice, the passive movements intervention (to the ankle and elbow on the allocated side of the body) will continue until the participant is able to actively and independently move their ankles and elbows (both sides) through a full range of motion. The time point at which this occurs will be recorded. If the treating physiotherapist believes the participant is able to actively and independently move their ankles and elbow through a full range of motion (and thus no longer requires the passive movements intervention), this decision will be assessed, at the request of the treating physiotherapist, by another blinded physiotherapist. This assessment will comprise: (1) conscious state, using the Glasgow Coma Scale (score greater or equal to 13; e.g. opens eyes to speech, confused, obeys commands); (2) muscle power at ankles and elbows (greater than or equal to 3 out of 5, manual muscle test); (3) visual assessment that participant can independently move his/her ankles and elbows through a full range of motion. Other physiotherapy interventions (e.g. sitting out of bed, standing, walking) will continue as indicated, as per usual clinical practice, throughout the study period. If the participant is unable to actively and independently move their ankles and elbows through a full ROM by study completion (4 weeks), the clinical trial will still cease at this time point. If the participant is transferred out of ICU before study completion, the passive movements intervention will continue to be provided (if required) in the general ward and outcomes will be recorded as per the study protocol. Control side The side of the body allocated as the control side will not receive any passive movements by a physiotherapist as per standard practice our ICU.

Sponsors

Kathy Stiller
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Other
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

• Admitted to the Royal Adelaide Hospital ICU. • Intubated and expected to remain invasively mechanically ventilated > 48 hours (total). • Anticipated ICU length of stay greater than or equal to 5 days. • Aged greater than or equal to 18 years. • Unable to move their limbs through full range of motion voluntarily (either unconscious/sedated patients and/or those who are not able to move their limbs due to their underlying medical condition). This is likely to include patients with medical illnesses (e.g. severe respiratory failure, sepsis) who are receiving sedative medications as part of their care and/or patients after spinal cord injury or traumatic brain injury.

Exclusion criteria

• Refused consent (by patient or the person legally responsible or medical decision maker for that patient [if the patient is unable to consider participation due to their medical status]). • Admitted with a burn injury. • COVID-19 positive. • Pre-existing condition/injury that has adversely affected joint range of motion (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, neurological condition resulting in spasticity and contracture). • Documented pre-existing inability to understand written or spoken English to the extent that it would prevent comprehension of the aims and methodology of the proposed study. • Medical or surgical condition where the management includes no passive movements in a limb (e.g. limb fractures). • Death is deemed inevitable as a result of the current illness. • If the ICU admission is not the first ICU admission in the current hospitalisation. • Currently enrolled in another ICU interventional rehabilitation study.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026