Skip to content

Comparing blood concentrations of intravenous and nebulized sedatives and analgesics in patients who are on mechanical ventilation.

The PISA Study Comparative plasma Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous and nebulized Sedatives and Analgesic agents in mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective study.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12620001039976
Acronym
The PISA Study
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-10-13
Start date
2020-11-09
Completion date
2023-09-30
Last updated
2020-10-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Pain and discomfort are commonly associated with all disease conditions especially in critical care. Despite pharmacological developments, the management of pain and discomfort remains suboptimal and often associated with complications. Administering the existing drugs via the inhaled route could achieve better concentration of the drug for effective pain relief and sedation while avoiding side effects. Previous studies have demonstrated safety and often efficacy of inhaled sedatives and pain relief. However, due to the absence of concentration data there is lack of dosing guidelines and hence leading to variable dosing which causes inadequate clinical effect. This is a prospective, open labelled observational Pharmacokinetic (PK) (drug metabolism) study with the aim of describing the comparative concentrations of the single dose sedatives and pain relief agents between intravenous, through the vein and inhaled routes of drug delivery. Blood and urine samples will be studied to assess the concentrations of the sedative and pain relief. The following drugs will be observed: fentanyl, morphine, midazolam, clonidine, dexmedetomidine and ketamine. It is hoped that the knowledge gained from this study will enable the development of dosing regimens for optimal inhaled sedative and pain relief therapy. We plan to recruit at least 10 participants per drug for this study.

Interventions

This study is a single site, cross-over study, comparing the plasma pharmacokinetics (PK)s of sedative and analgesic agents with two routes of drug administration in critical care mechanically ventilated patients. In this study 60 patients who meet the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be recruited. In addition to the standard analgesia and sedation prescribed by the treating clinician, each patient will be assigned up to two drugs of investigation at any given time. The

This study is a single site, cross-over study, comparing the plasma pharmacokinetics (PK)s of sedative and analgesic agents with two routes of drug administration in critical care mechanically ventilated patients. In this study 60 patients who meet the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be recruited. In addition to the standard analgesia and sedation prescribed by the treating clinician, each patient will be assigned up to two drugs of investigation at any given time. The drug selection will depend on the following factors: • Exclusion of drugs with known hypersensitivity in the patient. • Exclusion of drugs that patient is already receiving as therapy via any route or frequency. Approach toward selecting study drug will include- 1. Inclusion criteria includes “requiring sedation and or analgesia as per treating team” – high likelihood of receiving at least one of the drugs being tested 2. Drugs that are being administered to the patients will be excluded. For e.g. if the patient is on fentanyl infusion, then fentanyl will not be a study drug. 3. Exclude drugs with known hypersensitivity in the patient e.g. if patient is allergic to morphine then morphine will not be a study drug. 4. May exclude drugs with synergistic effect- eg. if increased risk of hypotension –Dexmedetomidine and Clonidine would preferably not be used together 5. Selection of drug/drugs based on meeting recruitment target for drugs (10 complete sets for each drug – nebulised and Intravenous route) Each drug will be serially administered via one route Intravenous (IV) /nebulised (NEB) and after a minimum washout period of 12 hours following the sampling time, the 2nd route of administration. When enrolment is for two drugs, these will be administered via different routes. For example, if recruited for fentanyl and midazolam, then if fentanyl is administered intravenously, midazolam will be given concurrently via nebulized route initially with the administration routes changed to nebulization and intravenous respectively in the subsequent stage. The initial method of administration for each drug will be determined by a flip of a coin. Based on data from existing studies, the study drugs and their doses according to the route of administration include: Drugs (same for intravenous and nebulized route) Sedative agents Midazolam 5 mg Clonidine 75 µg Dexmedetomidine 50 µg Analgesic agents Fentanyl 50 µg Morphine 5 mg Ketamine 25 mg Intravenous drug administration: Participants will be administered the study drug intravenously via an existing peripheral or central intravenous catheter as per ICU policy and practise. Nebulized administration: A disposable vibrating mesh nebulizer that is currently being used in ICU will be utilised for the nebulization of the study drug. As per current practice, the nebulizer will be placed in the inspiratory limb of the circuit before the Y-piece. If there is a nebulizer in the circuit, only the nebulizer chamber will be replaced and the T-piece will not be changed. The study drugs will be diluted with normal saline. This solution will be instilled in the nebulizer reservoir. Blood samples will be collected over six hours from an existing arterial line or central venous catheter into heparinised tubes. A urine creatinine clearance will be performed over the sampling period up to 8 hour poste commencement of drug and a sample will be kept to determine drug renal excretion. Monitoring fidelity: Protocol adherence will be easily monitored as this is a single site study and the study team will be directly involved in each case. The study will be conducted in accordance with ethical principles consistent with the Declaration of Helsinki, and all relevant national and local guidelines on the ethical conduct of research. The research team will include experienced research coordinators, intensive care specialists as all with GCP training and they will have oversight of all study required activities and protocol adherence. All data will be entered directly from the source in to the electronic database. The data base has the capacity to run validity checks and logic queries to minimise errors. De-identified sampling spread sheets uploaded to the data base for validation of sampling time points. Audit of 100% consent, source data verification of essential data points for 20 % of participants.

Sponsors

REDUCE Centre for Research Excellence - University of Queensland
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Crossover
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

A mechanically ventilated patient requiring sedation and or analgesia who meets all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be considered for study participation. Inclusion criteria 1. Adult (>/= 18 years) ICU patient 2. Patient is receiving mechanical ventilation, FiO2< /= 40%, PEEP< /= 10 cm H20. 3. Patient has arterial line or central venous line for blood sampling 4. Patient requiring sedation and or analgesia as per the treating team. 5. Informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria 1. Suspected or known hypersensitivity to the drug being studied. 2. Severe chronic lung disease e.g. severe chronic airways disease, lung cancer 3. High ventilatory requirement. For e.g. FiO2>/=40% and PEEP >/=10 cm H20 4. Receiving extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation 5. Receiving renal replacement therapy 6. Liver failure or Child-Pugh C liver cirrhosis 7. Pregnant patients or lactating mothers

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026