Skip to content

Remote video auditing of surgical safety checklist compliance before and after feedback in the emergency operating theatre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital

Remote video auditing of hospital staff surgical safety checklist compliance before and after feedback in the emergency operating theatre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12620000853943
Acronym
nil
Enrollment
150
Registered
2020-08-27
Start date
2027-07-01
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The World Health Organisation (WHO) released a surgical safety checklist for use in any operating theatre environment. It was launched as part of the initiative: “Safe Surgery Saves Lifes” in 2008, aiming to reduce the number of surgical death around the world. However, surgical incident reports including near misses are still ongoing issues in hospitals nationally. It is therefore important to monitor compliance of surgical checklist completion and also its effectiveness. The use of remote video auditing has been described in the operating theatre to improve patient quality care because it influences healthcare worker’s behaviour, encourages best practice and also helps objectively analyse any adverse events. At the Royal Melbourne Hospital, we are installing remote video cameras in the operating theatre complex. The aim of this study is to assess the compliance of surgical checklist completion. We will compare the compliance rate before and after feedback with the use of remote video auditing. This study will be conducted over an 8-week period – 4 weeks without feedback of results to healthcare workers (HCW), followed by 4 weeks of weekly feedback of performance reports to HCW. We hypothesise that the compliance rate will improve with weekly feedback of performance.

Interventions

During the observation period, participants will monitored for the entire duration of an individual surgery via remote video every day for 4 weeks without feedback, followed by 4 weeks of weekly feedback of performance reports to healthcare workers. Two independent auditors will review and assess all the recorded video data. An event is defined as when a patient is having an operation in OR 2. “Passing” an event means healthcare workers have completed 3 phases of the checklist procedure. The

During the observation period, participants will monitored for the entire duration of an individual surgery via remote video every day for 4 weeks without feedback, followed by 4 weeks of weekly feedback of performance reports to healthcare workers. Two independent auditors will review and assess all the recorded video data. An event is defined as when a patient is having an operation in OR 2. “Passing” an event means healthcare workers have completed 3 phases of the checklist procedure. The criteria for “failing” an event is when any one of the 3 phases of the checklist procedure is not completed. The three phases of the checklist completion are: 1) before the induction of anaesthesia (“sign in”) and 2) before the incision of the skin (“time out”) and 3) before the patient leaves the operating room (“sign out”). This checklist is adhered to the World Health Organisation Surgical Safety Checklist: https://www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/tools_resources/SSSL_Checklist_finalJun08.pdf?ua=1. During the 4-week feedback period, a weekly performance report will be displayed in multiple areas of the perioperative department and will also be emailed weekly to all floor staff. In the case that a department meeting is held, performance reports will also be announced periodically. Feedback will be provided to all healthcare workers regardless of their involvement in this study.

Sponsors

Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Single group
Primary purpose
Educational / counselling / training
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

All health care workers completing a surgical checklist in the emergency theatre

Exclusion criteria

Any healthcare workers who do not work directly in the emergency theatre.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026