Skip to content

Glue vs. Tacks in Mesh Fixation for Minimally Invasive Inguinal Hernia Repair – A Randomised Controlled Trial

Cyanoacrylate Glue vs. Absorbable Tacks in Mesh Fixation for Laparoscopic Extra-Peritoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair – A Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12620000742976
Enrollment
122
Registered
2020-07-16
Start date
2017-10-30
Completion date
2019-04-01
Last updated
2020-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Keyhole inguinal hernia repair is a common operation which requires a netting mesh to reinforce the inguinal region. It may be fixed in the required position by sutures or metal/biodegradable tacks. An alternative to either of these is a cyanoacrylate glue which is a strong, inert plastic glue. Early studies show that it has the same fixation effect as other methods. It may have the advantage of reducing the operating time and avoiding damage to underlying structures (such as nerve or blood vessels) that sutures or tacks may cause. Our study aims to compare the use of glue to the current methods of fixation in keyhole inguinal hernia repair, particularly examining if it has the benefit of reducing groin pain for patients after the operation. We aim to randomly assign patients who have already agreed and consented to a keyhole inguinal hernia repair, to either glue or tack fixation for their mesh during their operation. All other aspects of their surgery and care will be the same. We will also review each patient’s wellbeing at the normal time points after the operation as we would for a standard inguinal hernia operation.

Interventions

Brief name: mesh fixation methods in laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair (IHR) Why: there is controversy surrounding the ideal fixation method for mesh in laparoscopic hernia repair. The goal of this study was to compare different mesh fixation methods in TEP IHR with the primary outcome focusing on chronic post-operative inguinal pain, which is a known complication of IHR. Arm 1: Absorbable tack fixation *tacks made of an absorbable synthetic polyester copolyme

Brief name: mesh fixation methods in laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair (IHR) Why: there is controversy surrounding the ideal fixation method for mesh in laparoscopic hernia repair. The goal of this study was to compare different mesh fixation methods in TEP IHR with the primary outcome focusing on chronic post-operative inguinal pain, which is a known complication of IHR. Arm 1: Absorbable tack fixation *tacks made of an absorbable synthetic polyester copolymer. Intra-operatively, they are applied using a laparoscopic absorbable tack fixation device. Manufactured by Medtronic (NSW, Australia). Arm 2: Cyanoacrylate glue fixation * Glubran2 is a cyanoacrylate glue that is modified by the addition of a monomer synthesized by the manufacturer. Intra-operatively, it is applied using a laparoscopic glue application tool. Manufactured by Matrix Surgical (Clayton, VIC, Australia). Procedures: each intervention arm involved patients aged 18 years or over, undergoing elective laparoscopic TEP IHR. Apart from mesh fixation, all other aspects of surgery and aftercare remained the same in both arm. Who: eligible care providers were all General Surgeons who were fellows of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS). How: mesh fixation was performed intra-operatively on each patient enrolled in the study. It was performed by participating surgeons as described above. Where: The interventions occurred at two centres, The Northern and Broadmeadows Hospitals. The Northern Hospital is a 400-bed tertiary health centre situated in Epping, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Broadmeadows Hospital is a smaller surgical health centre, located in Broadmeadows, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Both centres are part of the Northern Health Service, and provide tertiary health care to the metropolitan and rural communities of north-western Victoria. When and How Much: Each intervention was performed once per hernia. In the case of patients who had bilateral hernia repairs in the same operation, each individual hernia was randomised separately to receive an intervention. The intervention occurred during the patient's operation, with no further interventions after the hernia repair. Tailoring: interventions (mesh fixation methods) were not personalised, titrated or adapted to participants. Modifications: interventions (mesh fixation methods) were not modified during the course of the study How Well Planned/Actual: surgeon adherence to the correct method of cyanoacrylate glue mesh fixation was enhanced by the presence of the manufacturer’s representative during the operation. This did not occur during absorbable tack mesh fixation as it was considered the "standard-of-care" method.

Sponsors

Henry To
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients 18 years of age or more who were undergoing elective laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair

Exclusion criteria

High BMI, an inability to tolerate general anaesthesia, emergency repair, or patients with a history of pre-operative chronic pain on regular opioids or neuropathic agents.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026