Skip to content

The Impact of High-Intensity Interval Training Exercise on Breast Cancer Survivors: A Pilot Study to Explore Fitness, Cardiac Regulation and Biomarkers of the Stress Systems

The Impact of High-Intensity Interval Training Exercise on Breast Cancer Survivors: A Pilot Study to Explore Fitness, Cardiac Regulation and Biomarkers of the Stress Systems

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12620000684921
Enrollment
17
Registered
2020-06-16
Start date
2019-02-04
Completion date
2019-08-01
Last updated
2020-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Background: The aim of this study was to explore the impact of exercise intensity on aerobic fitness and autonomic cardiac regulation (heart rate variability (HRV)) and salivary biomarkers of the stress systems (HPA-axis, cortisol; sympathetic nervous system, a-amylase) and mucosal immunity (secretory(s)-IgA), in breast cancer survivors. Methods: Seventeen participants (62 ± 8 years) were randomly assigned to; 1) high intensity interval training (HIIT; n = 6); 2) moderate-intensity, continuous aerobic training (CMIT; n = 5); or 3) a wait-list control (CON; n = 6) for a 12-week (36 session) stationary cycling intervention. Cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak), resting HRV and salivary biomarkers were measured at baseline 2-4 d pre-intervention and 2-4 d post the last exercise session. Results: A significant improvement (p = 0.05) was observed for VO2peak in the HIIT group; 19.3% (B = 3.98, 95%CI = [1.89 ; 4.02]) and a non-significant increase in the CMIT group; 5.6% (B = 1.96, 95%CI = [-0.11; 4.03]), compared with a 2.6% (B = -0.64, 95%CI = [-2.10; 0.82]) decrease in the CON group. Post intervention improvements in HRV markers of vagal activity (log(ln)LF/HF, LnRMSSD) and sympathetic nervous system (a-amylase waking response) occurred for individuals exhibiting outlying (> 95% CI) levels at baseline compared to general population. Conclusion: High intensity interval training improved cardiovascular fitness in breast cancer survivors and improved cardiac regulation, and sympathetic nervous system (stress) responses in some individuals. High-intensity interval training was safe and effective for breast cancer survivors to participate in with promising results as a time efficient intensity to improve physical health and stress.

Interventions

Seventeen participants (62 ± 8 years) were randomly assigned to; 1) high intensity interval training (HIIT; n = 6); 2) moderate-intensity, continuous aerobic training (CMIT; n = 5); or 3) a wait-list control (CON; n = 6) for a 12-week (36 session) stationary cycling intervention. Cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak), resting HRV and salivary biomarkers were measured at baseline 2-4 d pre-intervention and 2-4 d post the last exercise session. Exercise groups Participants in the two exercise inter

Seventeen participants (62 ± 8 years) were randomly assigned to; 1) high intensity interval training (HIIT; n = 6); 2) moderate-intensity, continuous aerobic training (CMIT; n = 5); or 3) a wait-list control (CON; n = 6) for a 12-week (36 session) stationary cycling intervention. Cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak), resting HRV and salivary biomarkers were measured at baseline 2-4 d pre-intervention and 2-4 d post the last exercise session. Exercise groups Participants in the two exercise interventions attended the University of Canberra laboratory three times per week for twelve weeks (up to 36 sessions). Participants could choose from a series of scheduled timeslots where supervision was provided across the week and where compliance could be recorded. Each session was conducted on the Monark cycle ergometer and lasted 20-30 mins depending on the allocated intervention group. Participant numbers in each session were between 1 and 4 dependent on number of participants attending at each session. Sessions were fully supervised by an experienced Accredited Exercise Physiologist or Accredited Exercise Scientist. Participant’s heart rate (HR) was continuously measured and recorded during all exercise sessions using a heart rate monitor (Polar FT40, Finland). Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was monitored and recorded throughout each session (Borg 6-20). Exercise sessions started and finished with a 5-minute warm up and cool down, completed on the cycle ergometers at ~50% of their maximal power (watts) achieved in the baseline incremental exercise test. The CMIT group cycled for 30 minutes in total, with 20 minutes at 55-65% of their maximal power. The workload was adjusted over 12 weeks within this range to ensure their RPE remained between 9 and 13 on the Borg scale . The HIIT group completed seven 30 second intervals (as hard as they could) with 2 minutes of active recovery between each. Participants were instructed to increase their cadence to between 95 and 115 RPM to ensure consistent performance. Participants initially completed four intervals in each session, and this was gradually increased to achieve the target of seven intervals by week four. Control group Participants in the waitlisted control group (CON) were asked to continue with their current lifestyle for 12 weeks after the baseline tests. After completion, the participants from the CON group were offered the 12 week fully supervised intervention.

Sponsors

University of Canberra
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Educational / counselling / training
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
50 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants were included in this study if they were; (1) females between the ages of 50 and 75 years, (2) sedentary as classified by the American College of Sports Medicine, (3) were within two years post-cancer treatment and (4) did not take blood pressure medication (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers or calcium channel blockers or beta-blockers), (5) did not have brain or bone metastasis or (6) a diagnosis of secondary cancers and (7) were able to perform the exercise sessions on a stationary cycle ergometer (Monark 828E Ergometer).

Exclusion criteria

Anyone taking blood pressure medication Brain or bone metastasis A diagnosis of secondary cancers Unable to perform exercise sessions on a stationary cycle

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026