Skip to content

The impact of peer educators on human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) testing, treatment linkage and viral suppression

Peer-led HIV care and the UNAIDS 90-90-90 treatment targets in Sidama, Ethiopia: A cluster randomized trial and economic evaluation of Teach-Test-Link-Trace model trial protocol

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12620000570987
Acronym
The TTLT trial
Enrollment
5440
Registered
2020-05-15
Start date
2024-06-15
Completion date
2024-11-15
Last updated
2024-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Background: This trial describes a cluster randomized trial designed to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of a new intervention program called teach-test-link-trace (TTLT) model. TTLT model is a new program in which peer educators counsel about HIV (teach), perform HIV testing (test) through pinprick house-to-house HIV testing (H2H) or OralQuick HIV self-testing (HIVST), link HIV positive patients to HIV care (link) and trace lost patients house-to-house (trace). Methods: The TTLT model is a 4-arm cluster randomized trial to be conducted in 40 villages in Sidama, SouthEthiopia. The trial has five phases as follows: Phase 1 will assess the acceptability of the TTLT model using a cross-sectional survey. We will measure acceptability from participants using Sekhon and colleagues’ theoretical framework of acceptability of healthcare interventions. Phase 2 will assess effectiveness of the TTLT model through comparing intervention and control groups. For baseline data, we assess the proportion of individuals who self-report to know their HIV status. The intervention groups will receive one of the three home-based interventions provided by peer educators: (i) demonstrate and distribute OralQuick HIV self-testing kits (HIVST), (ii) perform pinprick HIV testing (H2H), and (iii) offer participants a choice to either receive HIVST or H2H. The peer educators will refer all individuals of the three intervention groups to nearby health facilities for confirmatory test if the test result is positive. Peer educators will also conduct a follow up as part of the intervention (at 0, 3 and 6 months after of the antiretroviral therapy) to those who will be diagnosed with HIV through HIVST or H2H and linked with HIV care. The control group will receive the standard care in which nurses counsel and refer eligible household members to nearby health facilities to access existing HIV testing services. The primary outcomes of the interventions are proportion of individuals who know of their HIV status (first 90), link to HIV care and treatment (second 90) and meet virological suppression (third 90). We will perform process evaluation of the trial through qualitative interviews in phase 3, economic evaluation for cost-effectiveness analysis in phase 4, and a sustainability exit strategy using nominal group technique in phase 5. To analyse the quantitative studies, we will apply descriptive and inferential statistical analyses, and qualitative studies will employ thematic framework and content analyses. Ethics approvals will be sought from Flinders University of South Australia and Mekelle University of Northern Ethiopia. The registration for the trial is the intervention phase.

Interventions

The intervention in the study is called a TTLT model. TTLT model is a new program in which peer educators counsel about HIV (teach), perform house-to-house HIV testing (test) through pinprick HIV testing (H2H) or OralQuick HIV self-testing (HIVST), link HIV positive patients to HIV care (link) and trace lost patients house-to-house (trace). Peer educators will then 'link' them to HIV treatment and follow them to remain in the care. The peer educators will 'trace' if people who started treatment

The intervention in the study is called a TTLT model. TTLT model is a new program in which peer educators counsel about HIV (teach), perform house-to-house HIV testing (test) through pinprick HIV testing (H2H) or OralQuick HIV self-testing (HIVST), link HIV positive patients to HIV care (link) and trace lost patients house-to-house (trace). Peer educators will then 'link' them to HIV treatment and follow them to remain in the care. The peer educators will 'trace' if people who started treatment lost from the care. In general, the over all trial has the following phases. Phase 1 will assess the acceptability of the TTLT model using a cross-sectional survey. We will measure acceptability from participants using Sekhon and colleagues’ theoretical framework of acceptability of healthcare interventions. Phase 2 will assess effectiveness of the TTLT model through comparing intervention and control groups for six months. For baseline data, we assess the proportion of individuals who self-report to know their HIV status. The intervention groups will receive one of the three home-based interventions provided by peer educators: (i) demonstrate and distribute OralQuick HIV self-testing kits (HIVST), (ii) perform pinprick HIV testing (H2H), and (iii) offer participants a choice to either receive HIVST or H2H. The peer educators will refer all individuals of the three intervention groups to nearby health facilities for confirmatory test if the test result is positive. Peer educators will also conduct a follow up as part of the intervention (at 0, 3 and 6 months after of the antiretroviral therapy) to those who will be diagnosed with HIV through HIVST or H2H and linked with HIV care. The control group will receive the standard care in which nurses counsel and refer eligible household members to nearby health facilities to access existing HIV testing services. The primary outcomes of the interventions are proportion of individuals who know of their HIV status (first 90), link to HIV care and treatment (second 90) and meet virological suppression (third 90). We will perform process evaluation of the trial through qualitative interviews in phase 3, economic evaluation for cost-effectiveness analysis in phase 4, and a sustainability exit strategy using nominal group technique in phase 5.

Sponsors

Torrens University Australia
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

The population in the intervention phase will include individuals aged 18 years and above who will report negative HIV status in three months’ time before data collection.

Exclusion criteria

HIV positive people will be excluded from the testing intervention. However, if the peer educators found them not linked to care, they will refer them to link to care.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026