Skip to content

Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction with Fresh Frozen Allograft

Clinical and Subjective Outcomes after Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction with Fresh Frozen Allograft

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12620000286943
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-03-03
Start date
2020-05-15
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2021-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This study will prospectively follow a group of patients who undergo ACL reconstruction with the use of a fresh frozen allograft

Interventions

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most commonly injured ligament in the knee. Injury to the ACL often necessitates surgical reconstruction in the subject who wishes to remain active in sidestepping and pivoting activities. ACL surgery is often recommended in subjects to protect their menisci and articular cartilage from damage that can be associated with chronic ACL deficiency. Autograft tissue has traditionally been the graft of choice among most knee ligament surgeons. The ipsilate

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most commonly injured ligament in the knee. Injury to the ACL often necessitates surgical reconstruction in the subject who wishes to remain active in sidestepping and pivoting activities. ACL surgery is often recommended in subjects to protect their menisci and articular cartilage from damage that can be associated with chronic ACL deficiency. Autograft tissue has traditionally been the graft of choice among most knee ligament surgeons. The ipsilateral hamstring tendon and bone-patella-tendon-bone is thought by many to be the gold standard autograft tissue of choice. Due to graft site morbidity, the necessity of revision surgeries in some cases and a more difficult rehabilitation, allograft tissue has been investigated by surgeons. As such, the popularity of allograft tissue as a graft choice has increased over the past decade. The main potential advantages of the use of an allograft in primary ACL reconstruction include no donor site morbidity, no associated weakness of the knee flexor mechanism (as in ipsilateral hamstring grafts), potentially shorter operating time, less post operative pain and availability of larger graft sizes. Allograft potential advantages also extend to revision surgery where larger grafts can be utilised and there is the option to have a bone block attached to the graft. Literature has shown that allograft is a reasonable alternative to autograft for ACL reconstruction. The majority of the literature available on allografts is from irradiated or chemically treated grafts. To date research that is published on non-irritated fresh frozen allografts including systematic reviews has demonstrated smaller sample sizes or limited measures of patient-orientated outcomes or instrumented laxity. With the increasing availability of human tissue banks and a well established screening, retrieval and testing to minimise the risk of transfer of infection with allografts, there is a need to evaluate a larger sample size of subjects with non-chemically treated grafts. The aim of this research is to assess the 2 year clinical outcomes of fresh frozen allograft in ACL reconstruction. Assessment will include knee stability, subjective outcomes, return to sport and reinjury at 1 and 2 years after surgery with standardised, reliable and validated assessment tools.

Sponsors

North Sydney Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Centre
Lead SponsorOther Collaborative groups

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. ACL reconstruction (including revision and bilateral) performed by Professor Leo Pinczewski 2. Allograft utilised as the ACL graft 3. Be willing and capable of providing written informed consent 4. Be willing and capable to attend The Mater Clinic for all post-operative assessments

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects who do not wish to participate in a research program 2. Significant chondral damage or degeneration (grade III-IV) 3. Medical conditions that may adversely influence healing progress post-operatively 4. Subjects who are seeking compensation for their injury

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026