Skip to content

A study assessing the impact of frailty on therapy in older people with blood cancers

Geriatric assessment of frailty in patients with Haematological Malignancies - A study determining the impact of frailty in older people with haematological malignancies.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12620000271909
Acronym
The GAP-HaeM Study (Geriatric assessment of frailty in patients with Haematological Malignancies)
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-03-02
Start date
2020-03-09
Completion date
2021-03-01
Last updated
2020-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This study is looking at how changes associated with ageing or frailty in people aged 65 years and older impacts on their ability to tolerate treatment for their blood cancer and how the therapy affects their fitness and quality of life. Who is it for? You may be eligible for this study if you are 65 years or older and you have been diagnosed with one of the following conditions: Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), Acute myeloid leukemia (AML), Multiple myeloma (MM), Diffuse-B cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), and will commence treatment either for the first time or after a first relapse. Study details All participants will undergo frailty screening assessments to determine eligibility to stream 1 (standard of care) or stream 2 (randomization to Arm A or Arm B). Participants will be allocated to stream 2 if they have two or more screening assessments with scores outside the normal range. Stream 1 participants will have one or no scores outside the normal range. All participants in stream 2 will be randomly allocated (50/50 chance) to Arm A or Arm B. Participants in Arm A will receive standard care from their Haematologist. Participants in Arm B will receive a tailored multidisciplinary approach to their management with specialists including a Geriatrician, Physicians, nurses, allied health and pharmacists. This visit with the specialist will take up to 1 hour for a comprehensive review. Participants in Part B will also be followed up monthly via phone calls. All participants regardless of allocation with be provided with a diary to log GP visits, emergency room encounters, unplanned admissions and any other event of significance to you. Why is this important? The knowledge gained from this trial will help doctors to determine the best therapy option for an individual by taking into consideration their unique ageing process and quality of life prior to commencing therapy. This will provide a more tailored approach to managing an older person's cancer.

Interventions

All patients enrolled in the trial will undergo a panel of screening tools performed by a trained study member. The screening tools will be conducted face to face in the clinic setting where required and over the phone where that assessment allows. The following tools have been selected to evaluate each domain of ageing, as well as addressing important 'geriatric syndromes'. The scores reflecting impairment are listed and were selected based on either standardised cut-offs or most frequently rep

All patients enrolled in the trial will undergo a panel of screening tools performed by a trained study member. The screening tools will be conducted face to face in the clinic setting where required and over the phone where that assessment allows. The following tools have been selected to evaluate each domain of ageing, as well as addressing important 'geriatric syndromes'. The scores reflecting impairment are listed and were selected based on either standardised cut-offs or most frequently reported cut-offs used in the literature: 1. Functional status: -Activities of Daily Living (ADL) tool – basic functions including bathing, dressing, toileting, continence, transfers and feeding. A total score less than or equal to 5 out of 6 indicates the presence of impairment. -Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (iADL) tool – higher functional activities including using a phone, shopping, food preparation, housekeeping, laundry, transport, medication and financial management. Scores indicative of the presence of impairments are less than or equal to 7 out of 8 for women and less than or equal to 4 out of 5 for men 2. Cognition: -Standardised minimental state examination: score less than or equal to 24/30 indicates significant impairment. Additionally a short term recall score of less than or equal to 2/3 will be flagged as abnormal as mild cognitive deficits can progress to more severe impairment. This is will be an important longitudinal analysis with repeated testing. -Frontal Assessment Battery: less than or equal to 12/18 The Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Score (RUDAS) will be used for culturally and linguistically diverse persons: less than or equal to 22/30 2. Comorbidity: -Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is reflective of the burden of comorbidity which is correlated with mortality and progression free survival in the oncological setting A score of more than or equal to 3 indicates a significantly high burden. -Other significant comorbidities specific to this population not captured by the CCI will also be recorded and if present will be recorded as abnormal. 3. Mental health: -Short version Geriatric Depression Scale GDS-15: A score of more than or equal to 5 out of 15 indicates the need to evaluate the patient’s mental health for possible depression -Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: HAD-S >8 4. Nutrition: Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA): A score of 17 to 23.5 indicates a risk of malnutrition and a score <17 indicates malnourishment. The threshold for an abnormal score will therefore be 23.5. 5. Mobility and frailty: -Timed Up and Go (TUG) test which assesses dynamic mobility and balance for mobile patients: A cut off time of 13.5 seconds or more indicates a higher risk of falls and frailty -Grip strength using a handheld dynamometer 6. Patient reported outcome measures: EORTC QLQ-C30 QOL Questionnaire. Each domain will be evaluated. Score changes of more than or equal to 10 points will be highlighted for clinical attention as these represent changes in supportive care needs. 7. The Geriatric Risk G8 screening tool The baseline panel will be performed prior to the commencement of therapy or within 7 days of commencement of their cycle of therapy to minimize the confounding effect of therapy on the results of the tools. The screening tools are repeated at 2 to 3 monthly intervals to 12 months from enrollment in the study. The entire assessment panel from our previous experience takes 30-45 minutes. Patients with abnormal scores on at least 2 screening tools at baseline will be enrolled in the randomized arm - Stream 2. In stream 2 patients will be randomized within each condition - with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) and Multiple Myeloma (MM), Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in a 1:1 fashion to either control Arm A or intervention Arm B. Arm A: Standard of care: patients will be managed by their Haematologist in line with current protocols and procedures. There is a Nursing case coordinator at our institution for each disease stream as part of standard of care however there is no Oncogeriatric service or support. Screening assessments will be repeated during therapy as above. After the completion or cessation of therapy patients are usually followed up at 3 monthly intervals in the Haematology outpatient department as part of standard of care. Repeat assessments will occur at these standard follow-up appointments. Cross over to arm B is not permitted. Arm B: Randomisation within each disease stream will occur to one of 2 management pathways: • Standard of care (SOC): Patients are managed in line with current protocols/procedures • Coordinated Multidisciplinary Case Management (CM2): This is based on the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment model and consists of discussion at Multidisciplinary Meeting (physicians, nursing, pharmacy, allied health) where interventions will be tailored for the patient. Cases may be discussed more than once depending on their complexity and changing needs of the patient. The Multidiscplinary meeting will be scheduled for 90 minutes to discuss and document interventions. •The patient will be reviewed by a Geriatrician or General Physician with expertise in Geriatric Medicine, to provide a sustainable model to services that do not have access to a Geriatrician. The initial consult will be face to face, lasting approximately an hour for a comprehensive review. Follow-up appointments will be determined by the clinician and in line with patient preference. Telemedicine options can also be offered to patients if appropriate. Interventions according to deficits have been predetermined to reduce variation in clinical practice between clinicians. Interventions will be recommended in joint decision making with the patient +/- carer. If any interventions are declined this will be recorded. Additional interventions can be recommended by the physician as required and will be recorded. Interventions recommended will be followed up with monthly phone calls. Examples of interventions according to domains: - Chronic disease management, if CCI is more than or equal to 3: Optimisation of conditions, reconciliation with clinical practice guidelines including lifestyle modifications for example reduced salt diets and fluid restriction for heart failure, diabetic diets for diabetics. Referral for further investigation/evaluation where appropriate and necessary. - Functional status: Refer for appropriate physical therapy program or allied health assessment (physiotherapy or exercise physiologist). Referral to support providers +/- My aged care (may need occupational therapy assessment) - Cognitive status: Stratified according to presence of cognitive impairment. Further memory evaluation, management as indicated, carer referral to community support services including support groups for counselling and education, during hospitalisation ensuring that the ward is adherent to Delirium Clinical Care Standards and Dementia Care in Hospitals Program - Nutritional status: Dietitian referral, dietary counselling, nutritional supplements. Speech pathology assessment or dental review may be indicated for denture fitting or dental hygiene if not already done as part of standard of care. - Mental Health: GDS-15 >5, HAD-S >8. Further evaluation/referral either with the primary care provider (GP management plan) or specialist services if severe - Medication reconciliation: correspondence with primary care provider and haematologist. - Patient reported outcome measures, EORTC QLQ-C30 QOL Questionnaire – significant changes in domains or change in score of more than or equal to 10 points will prompt a review of patient’s goals and supportive care needs. Participants in all streams will be provided with a patient diary to record hospitalizations, emergency department presentations and any other events or encounters they deem of significance. This diary will be reviewed at each scheduled visit.

Sponsors

Dr Angela Molga
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients must satisfy the following criteria to be enrolled in the study: · Age 65 years or older · Diagnosis of haematological malignancy according to relevant classification system o Lymphoma –diffuse B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) o Multiple myeloma – for first line treatment or first relapse o Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) · Ability to provide informed consent. If patients are from a non-english speaking background, informed consent will be determined using an interpreter and including carers · Able to participate in study assessments · Life expectancy predicted by the clinician to be over 6 months · If therapy has commenced at the time of enrollment, then baseline assessments must be completed within 7 days of commencement of therapy

Exclusion criteria

· Age <65 years of age · MDS, AML patients previously treated with azacitidine, intensive chemotherapy and/or allogeneic stem cell transplantation · DLBCL and multiple myeloma patients failed 2 lines of treatment · End of life care at time of enrollment · Best supportive care treatment at time of enrollment. Patients can be reconsented if they are then determined for active therapy and meet all other inclusion criteria. · Enrollment on any other study where non-interventional studies are prohibited · Any significant condition that would confound the collection or interpretation of data from the study · Unable or unwilling to provide consent

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026