Skip to content

Reliability, validity and responsiveness of chiropractic assessment techniques.

Reliability, validity and responsiveness of compressive prone leg check and sacral leg check for the assessment of vertebral subluxations.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12620000136909
Enrollment
67
Registered
2020-02-11
Start date
2021-05-20
Completion date
2025-06-02
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Tests of leg length inequality and sacral function are an integral component of many chiropractic analytical techniques. However, little is known about the reliability, validity and responsiveness of individual tests that include leg length testing or sacroiliac joint motion. This study will evaluate the psychometric properties of compressive prone leg check or the sacral leg check. This will include an assessment of the reliability, validity and responsiveness of these tests, and an assessment of whether the pressure placed on the patient's feet or the sacrum during the testing influences the results of the tests. The results of this study should be of interest to chiropractors and educators who routinely use and teach the use of this test as a means of analysing for vertebral subluxations.

Interventions

The study involves a single experimental session. The reliability and validity of the two chiropractic analytical tests will be assessed first. Following recruitment and screening, eligible participants will be assessed by two chiropractors using two analytical techniques: compressive prone leg check and sacral leg check. Compressive prone leg check and sacral leg check ascertain the site of vertebral subluxation by evaluating leg length inequality (LLI) and sacral restriction, respectively. Com

The study involves a single experimental session. The reliability and validity of the two chiropractic analytical tests will be assessed first. Following recruitment and screening, eligible participants will be assessed by two chiropractors using two analytical techniques: compressive prone leg check and sacral leg check. Compressive prone leg check and sacral leg check ascertain the site of vertebral subluxation by evaluating leg length inequality (LLI) and sacral restriction, respectively. Compressive prone leg check involves determining the relative position of the feet in two prone lying positions: knees straight and knees bent to 90 degrees. The sacral leg check involves comparing how high the participant raises each leg in a prone lying position with knees straight and noting the difference. Both the chiropractors will record the outcomes of these assessment tests on separate data collection sheets. The findings of each test will be compared between the two chiropractors to determine the reliability of the tests. The findings will also be compared to automated, computer-based video analysis to establish the validity of the tests. The computer-based video analysis will involve the use of a three-dimensional motion analysis system to record the position and movement of reflective markers placed on the participant's body. To determine whether the compressive prone leg check and sacral leg check are responsive to change caused by a chiropractic intervention, the participants detected with a vertebral subluxation will be randomised to receive either intervention or control intervention. The intervention will be a full spine adjustment session using an activator method technique protocol. The activator method is a standard chiropractic technique protocol that uses a small hand-held spring-loaded instrument called the Activator adjusting instrument to deliver fast, precise and low-force adjustments to the spine. A spinal adjustment is a form of manual therapy which often involves a high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust, which may induce an audible release of the joint. The single spinal adjustment intervention will take five minutes on average. The purpose of having the intervention group is to induce a change in the group, such that the responsiveness of the analytical techniques to detect that change can be evaluated in comparison to computer-based video analysis. Therefore, after the intervention, the participants will be re-assessed by one of the chiropractors using the compressive prone leg check and sacral leg check. Post-intervention computer-based video analysis will also be undertaken. The pre-post change in vertebral subluxation detected by the computer-based video analysis system will then be compared with pre-post change identified by the two analytical techniques. This will be used to determine the responsiveness of the analytical techniques.

Sponsors

New Zealand College of Chiropractic
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Other
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

All adults over the age of 18 years who volunteer to participate will be eligible. Participants may include students, staff, faculty, and patients of the College’s Chiropractic Centre and also family, friends and acquaintances of the New Zealand College of Chiropractic community. However, to evaluate the responsiveness of compressive prone leg check and sacral leg check, only participants with vertebral subluxations will be randomised to the intervention or control group.

Exclusion criteria

Participants will be excluded if they have any predisposing factors that interfere with the conduct of the leg and sacral check (e.g. inability to lie prone or have their knees flexed comfortably to 90 degrees, extend or flex their lower limb, lower limb amputation or other lower limb trauma). They will also be excluded if they have received a chiropractic adjustment in the previous seven days or if any red flag is present.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026