None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
The objective of this study was to develop and implement PFME intervention based on HBM and MI and evaluate its effectiveness in improving knowledge, attitude, practice (KAP) and self-efficacy together with continence status and severity of urinary symptom. A two-armed randomised control trial with a single-blind design was conducted in Maternity Hospital Kuala Lumpur among pregnant women. The intervention group received a single session of group PFME education which includes discussion and sharing of information about UI and PFME together with PFME demonstration and skill training. This was followed by periodic booster sessions at four weeks post PFME education session, early in the third-trimester and late-third trimester of pregnancy along with a weekly short message reminder to reinforce the practice of PFME over the eight weeks after the first PFME education session. These booster sessions focused on reinforcing the skills and targeted PFME, discussing experiences, challenges and barriers to practice PFME and to facilitate the continuous practice of PFME. Whereas, the control group followed the usual antenatal care. The main research hypothesis of this study was KAP, self-efficacy, continence status and severity of urinary symptom have significantly improved over time in the intervention groups compared to control group.
Interventions
The intervention group received the newly developed pelvic floor muscles exercise (PFME) intervention which developed based on Health Belief Model and Motivational Interviewing in addition to the usual prenatal care. The PFME intervention consisted of single PFME education sessions delivered at baseline, a personalized short text message reminder and three booster sessions at the week 4 post-education session, early third-trimester and late third-trimester. The whole intervention was facilitated by a primary researcher who was a physiotherapist. The first PFME education session was provided in a group of approximately 4 to 8 persons for about 40 to 45 minutes. During the session, the primary researcher actively engaged in facilitating discussion and providing information on urinary incontinence and PFME based on the perceived susceptibility and severity of UI, perceived benefit of PFME and perceived barriers to adhering to PFME. This session also involved teaching, demonstrating and practicing correct pelvic floor muscle contraction, together with educating on integrating the exercise into daily activities and healthy bladder habit strategies during and following pregnancy. This was followed by a weekly personalized short message reminder on adherence to PFME for eight week, examples “Remember your target PFME, 8-12 repetitions hold for 6-8 second three time daily" and "Don’t’ give up doing your PFME". The booster sessions took approximately 30 minutes which specifically focused on reinforcing the skills and aims for targeted PFME, discussing experiences, challenges and barriers in practicing PFME and to facilitate the continuous practice of PFME. The PFME is involves “squeeze with inward and upward lift” movement around urethra, vagina and anus. This exercise targeting to increase the strength, endurance and to improve function of pelvic floor muscles specifically in prevention and treatment of urinary incontinence. The targeted pelvic floor muscles exercise prescription were 8-12 repetitions hold for 6-8 second three time daily” and integrated the exercises into daily activities.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria of this study were pregnant women at 18 weeks gestation, with a singleton pregnancy and had provided informed consent to participate in this study.
Exclusion criteria
The exclusion criteria included pregnant women aged less than 18 years old and non-Malaysian. Also, pregnant women undergoing physiotherapy treatment for severe urinary incontinence had previous urogenital surgery and had chronic medical disorders before pregnancy (uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension, HIV positive, neurological condition or pelvic organ prolapse) were excluded from the study. Other exclusion criteria included pregnant women with a complicated pregnancy or contraindications to the practice of physical activity (preeclampsia, persistent bleeding, pre-term labour, incompetent cervix, acute febrile infection, fetal growth restriction, placenta previa or cephalopelvic disproportion).