Skip to content

Is more aggressive resection of the aorta for ascending aortic aneurysm safe and effective when compared to a less aggresive surgical approach?

Major adverse events rate after non-Hemiarch compared to hemiarch repair in ascending aortic aneurysm

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12619001583134
Enrollment
151
Registered
2019-11-18
Start date
2008-01-05
Completion date
2018-12-12
Last updated
2019-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The aim of our study was to analyze the immediate and long-term results of non-Hemiarch and Hemiarch repair in patients with ascending aortic aneurysm. It is hypothesized that hemiarch irepair is no less safe in the early postoperative period as non-hemiarch procedure and has better outcomes in respect of reoperation . For this purpose all of the patient population (n=151) was divided into 2 groups of patients. The first group of the patients (n=40) underwent ascending aortic replacement with a distal cross-clamp. The second group of the patients (n=111) underwent hemiarch repair using open distal aortic anastomosis.

Interventions

One hundred and fifty-one patients underwent elective ascending aortic replacement only for nonsyndromic aneurismal disease between January 2008 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. All data were prospectively collected and recorded. All surgeries were performed concurrently in the same time period. Surgeons who performed these operations were experienced with both circulatory arrest and clamped aortic anastomoses The decision to perform an ascending aortic replacement or a hemiarch r

One hundred and fifty-one patients underwent elective ascending aortic replacement only for nonsyndromic aneurismal disease between January 2008 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. All data were prospectively collected and recorded. All surgeries were performed concurrently in the same time period. Surgeons who performed these operations were experienced with both circulatory arrest and clamped aortic anastomoses The decision to perform an ascending aortic replacement or a hemiarch replacement was at the discretion of the surgeon. Description of the procedures: Surgical access was obtained through a median sternotomy. Hemiarch repair was conducted under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and MHCA with unilateral ACP via innominate artery with a flow rate of 8–10 ml/kg/min and perfusion pressure of 60–80 mmHg. Perfusion adequacy was evaluated using measurement of blood pressure in both radial arteries and cerebral oximetry using near-infrared spectroscopy. Once CPB was instituted, the aortic cross-clamp was applied, and the heart was arrested with antegrade cardioplegia. After gradual cooling and when rectal temperature was approximately 28 degrees C, the circulatory arrest was initiated. Hemiarch replacement involved resection lesser curve of the aortic arch from the base of the innominate artery (Zone 0) to a point immediately distal to the nadir of the lesser curvature (Zone 3 or Zone 2 if the left subclavian artery was too far). Ascending aortic replacement was performed under normothermia with an aortic cross-clamp at the base of the innominate artery. Audit of nurse notes (arterial pressure in both radial arteries, NIRS, body temperature), perfusion records (perfusion rate and perfusion pressure during both of cardiopulmonary bypass and unilateral cerebral perfusion in Hemiarch procedure, blood temperature, haemohydrobalance), blood tests (acid-base indices, total and biochemical blood tests) were performed to assess or monitor fidelity to the surgery. Mean duration of non-hemiarch and hemiarch repairs surgery is 300 and 370 min, respectively. Mean duration of the circulatory arrest and antegrade cerebral perfusion in the hemiarch group was 15 minutes. Follow-up information was collected using direct or phone contact with patients, relatives, or physicians. All survived patients underwent a clinical follow-up examination and aortic evaluation by CT scan before discharge, at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter. The median (1st–3rd quartile) duration of the follow-up period was 36 months (12–48 months). The follow-up time was calculated using the date of the most recent CT scan

Sponsors

Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center
Lead SponsorHospital

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients with nonsyndromic ascending aortic aneuysm

Exclusion criteria

Oncological disease (high degrees) Refusal of surgical treatment

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026