Skip to content

Choose your own adventure: An evaluation of a training video on escalation of care conversations during the pre-Medical Emergency Team (MET) period.

Choose your own adventure: An evaluation of a training video on escalation of care conversations for clinical deterioration not breaching the Medical Emergency Team (MET) criteria.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12619001575123
Acronym
na
Enrollment
67
Registered
2019-11-14
Start date
2019-11-20
Completion date
2019-11-27
Last updated
2021-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Delays in escalation of care (EOC) can have serious consequences for patient safety and patient outcomes. While initiating a Medical Emergency Team (MET) call is a relatively smooth process, there are no defined behaviours surrounding pre-MET conversations. Even with well-established protocols, clinicians are reported to experience factors that inhibit initiation of EOC conversations. Research has identified key barriers to initiating EOC conversations as: fear of hierarchy, respondents explaining away or dismissing concerns, and poor risk awareness or skills. The purpose of this project is to address some of the barriers involved in EOC conversations prior to a MET call. To do this, an intervention that provides clinicians with training on the expectations of the ‘initiator’ and the ‘responder’ during an escalation conversation (in the form of a ‘choose-your-own-adventure’ training video) will be trialled at Austin Health. The training will be evaluated using pre- and post-intervention questionnaires on clinicians’ knowledge, confidence, and reluctance to escalate patient care, and experience sampling will be employed to examine clinicians’ experiences of EOC conversations during the trial period.

Interventions

The intervention consists of a short interactive training video completed as a one-off training session, lasting approximately 10 minutes. The training is designed to improve escalation of care conversations between clinicians by exposing each participant to a series of pre-Medical Emergency Team (MET) conversations and scenarios that enable them to practice identifying specific pre-MET communication skills and navigate common challenges. The training takes the form of a choose-your-own adventur

The intervention consists of a short interactive training video completed as a one-off training session, lasting approximately 10 minutes. The training is designed to improve escalation of care conversations between clinicians by exposing each participant to a series of pre-Medical Emergency Team (MET) conversations and scenarios that enable them to practice identifying specific pre-MET communication skills and navigate common challenges. The training takes the form of a choose-your-own adventure video to engage and immerse the viewer and to enable computer-generated feedback on their learning via different outcomes and lessons associated with the choices made at each decision point. The scenarios were developed specifically for this study, with input from key stakeholders, including from four public hospitals in Victoria (Eastern Health, Austin Health, The Alfred, and Royal Melbourne hospitals). The video will take every participant through five core scenarios related to the escalation of care process, designed to elicit a key communication principle central to appropriate escalation of care (in the same order). The themes of these five scenarios are: i) effective communication of critical information between team members, ii) obtaining the right information before escalating care, iii) ensuring communication is clear, concise, and structured, iv) speaking up and discussing clinical concerns as the arise, and v) respectful, closed-loop communication. A participant questionnaire will be used to monitor adherence to the intervention, and up to two email reminders to complete the training will be sent to participants over a one-week period.

Sponsors

Monash University
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Single group
Primary purpose
Educational / counselling / training
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Clinicians of all age groups who work at the recruitment sites during the trial period and are potentially involved in escalation of care conversations through their work are eligible to participate, including nursing staff, doctors, and allied health professionals.

Exclusion criteria

No further exclusion criteria were required following recruitment.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026