None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
This is an observational study of 42 patients comparing measurements of carbon dioxide levels in their arterial blood (standard care for critically unwell patients) with measurements of carbon dioxide taken from a transcutaneous (skin) probe. Our study will look at the level of agreement between these two measurements with the implication that if there is good agreement, a much less invasive (less painful) transcutaneous measurement may be adequate to monitor carbon dioxide levels.
Interventions
This study is comparing measurements of carbon dioxide levels in arterial blood (standard care for critically unwell patients) with measurements of carbon dioxide taken from a transcutaneous (skin surface) probe. Our study will look at the level of agreement between these two measurement methods to examine whether the skin probe is adequate to monitor carbon dioxide in the emergency department setting. If shown to be adequate, it could spare patients a painful procedure (arterial cannulation) which is currently required as the standard of care. Our intervention is the use of the Sentec Digital Monitor System to perform carbon dioxide level measurements at 4 time intervals for the study participants. Emergency department nursing staff will use the Sentec Digital Monitor System's sensor which is clipped to the patient's ear to perform transcutaneous measurement of carbon dioxide levels at 0mins, 30mins, 60mins and 90mins post enrolment in the emergency department resuscitation area.
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Emergency department patient Patient requiring hospital admission Adult > 18 years of age Arterial catheter required for ongoing care
Exclusion criteria
Children (<18 years) Patients not requiring arterial line