Skip to content

A Comparison of the Outcomes of Quadriceps Autograft versus Hamstring Autograft For Use In Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing The Outcomes Of Quadriceps Autograft vs Hamstring Autograft In ACL Reconstruction

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12619001396112
Enrollment
120
Registered
2019-10-11
Start date
2019-10-28
Completion date
2020-10-28
Last updated
2019-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

ACL reconstruction is a very common procedure performed, with several auto- and allograft choices being advocated. Over the years most of the focus has been on bone –patella – bone and Hamstring autograft, with a recent systematic review concluding that Hamstring autografts are superior in preventing anterior knee pain, and that Bone – Patellar – bone showed weak evidence of providing better stability. Quadriceps - Bone autografts have been compared to Bone-patellar bone, and results report equal stability and patient reported outcomes. However, Quadriceps autografts seem to have less donor site morbidity, and some report improved rotational stability. Fulkerson et al. reported on the technique of an all soft tissue quads harvesting technique, thereby avoiding morbidity of hamstring harvest, and bone harvest from the patellar leading to increased pain and risk of patellar fracture. The literature comparing Hamstring and Quadriceps is sparse and conflicting, with 1 RCT concluding Hamstrings offers superior stability and one cohort study concluding that the use of Quadriceps graft lead to equal or improved functional results compared to Hamstrings autograft, without affecting graft harvest morbidity. At our institutions we perform both Quadriceps and Hamstring autograft ACL reconstructions and we want to compare the difference in knee stability, donor site morbidity, and patient reported outcomes at one year and also assess re-rupture rates at 2 years postoperatively. Follow-up of this cohort of patient will continue through our ACL registry and further results reported later on.

Interventions

This is a randomised control trial comparing the outcomes of a quadriceps autograft versus a hamstring autograft for the treatment of ACL deficient knees in patients older than 15 years. The Surgery will be performed by a Senior Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon with at least 5 years experience. The patients will have an arthroscopic examination of the knee to ensure that they do not have any of the exclusion criteria. Then once they are determined to be eligible for the study an envelope will be

This is a randomised control trial comparing the outcomes of a quadriceps autograft versus a hamstring autograft for the treatment of ACL deficient knees in patients older than 15 years. The Surgery will be performed by a Senior Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon with at least 5 years experience. The patients will have an arthroscopic examination of the knee to ensure that they do not have any of the exclusion criteria. Then once they are determined to be eligible for the study an envelope will be opened which determines if a quadriceps or a hamstring tendon will be harvested. The ACL reconstruction will then be performed with the selected tendon. There is no significant difference in the time taken to harvest the quadriceps versus the hamstring tendon, with an approximate time of 45 minutes. Hamstrings: The Semitendinosus tendon is harvested from a 3 cm longitudinal incision over the pes anserine tendon origin utilizing an open tendon stripper. The Semi-tendinosis tendon is harvested and if a sufficient diameter and length was achieved, (length of at least 28cm and quadrupled diameter of at least 8 mm) the gracilis was left. However, if the length is not sufficient then the gracilis is harvested as well. The Semitendinosis is then prepared by incorporating the ABS tightrope. This is achieved by doubling up the tendon and whip stitching the ends together utilizing a fibre loop. The double loop is then quadrupled incorporating the RT tightrope. A 0 fibrewire suture is then placed 2cm from the end of the tendon at each end of the tendon. The suture goes through all the tendons and is then lopped around the graft. A so-called triple/double graft is prepared if both the gracilis and Semi-Tendinosus are prepared. Quadriceps: A full-thickness central slip of quadriceps tendon is harvested through a 3cm longitudinal incision over the proximal pole of the patella. A 10x7 mm Arthrex double blade is used to cut the central slip. The distal aspect is then released with a 15 Blade and the Cigar cutter utilized to strip proximally to a length of 7 cm and then cut. The proximal end is attached to an ABS tightrope using a fibrelink and the proximal aspect attached to a RT tightrope also utilizing a fibrelink. Preparation and drilling of tunnels: The ACL footprint in the notch is cleared with a shaver and electrocautery device to clearly see the back of the femoral condyle. The tibial stump of the ACL is removed. For both techniques after graft harvest: A 6/9 outside–in guide from Arthrex is utilized to place the femoral tunnel in the IDEAL position. The IDEAL femoral tunnel position aims to; replicate the most isometric fibres within the native ACL, be localized in the direct fibre subsection of the ACL origin base, be equidistant from the bottom and top of the notch with a tunnel back wall that is 1mm thick and eccentrically located high and deep within the footprint, be anatomic in position, and achieves a low tension-flexion pattern in the ACL graft, thus replicating the native tension-flexion behavior of the ACL. A flipcutter from Arthrex utilized to retrograde drill a tunnel of the measured diameter of the graft to a length of 25 mm. A fibrestick suture is passed and the loop is temporarily retrieved out of the lateral portal. An Arthrex tibial guide is used to drill an antegrade tunnel. The tibial guide angle is set at 55 degrees. A guide pin is inserted first and this is followed by a reamer diameter corresponding to the graft diameter plus 0.5mm, to help pull the graft through the tibia. The Femoral loop-passing suture is then retrieved through the tibial tunnel and the graft is delivered through the tibia into the femur. The RT button is flipped and pulled 1.5 cm into the femoral tunnel. The ABS button is then placed on the tibial side and tensioned ensuring 2 cm of length is in the tibial tunnel. Final tensioning of the RT button is then performed, pulling a further 5 mm into the femoral socket with the knee extended. All surgeons will undergo cadaver training prior to the commencement of the study to ensure uniformity of surgical technique. Post-operatively the patients will all undergo a standardised physiotherapy programme regardless of the tendon used for the reconstruction. Initially this consists of static quadriceps and hamstring exercises. Over the first 6 weeks gradual progression of range of motion, weight bearing progression and active assisted range quadriceps and hamstrings exercises. From 6 weeks onwards focus on strengthening and proprioceptive exercises. Physiotherapy will continue up to 6 months. This will be a multi-centre randomised controlled trial with locations in Whangarei, Auckland and Christchurch. The patients will have routine post-operative follow-ups at a prescribed time. There will be specific measurements of the stability of the reconstruction and strength testing of both the hamstrings and the quadriceps at the 1 year and 2 year mark

Sponsors

Northland Orthopaedics Research Charitable Trust
Lead SponsorCharities/Societies/Foundations

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

ACL deficiency with functional instability

Exclusion criteria

1. Concurrent other ligament injuries (PCL, Postero-lateral corner, Medial collateral ligament) 2. Contra-lateral knee ligament injury or previous surgery 3. Concurrent meniscal repair 4. Significant chondral damage (Outterbridge 2 or more) 5. Microfracture 6. Inability to understand/ read or answer the patient reported outcome forms 7. Peri-articular fractures (tibial plateau) 8. Neuro-vascular injuries 9. Revision ACL surgery 10. Patients requiring a lateral tenodesis or concurrent reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament (ie Grade 3 pivot shift and hyper-lax patients) 11. Previous hamstring/quadriceps injury or surgery 12. Concurrent injury preventing the ability to mobilise with crutches

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026