None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
Pathways and Resources for Engagement and Participation (PREP) is a 20-week innovative strengths-based intervention which aims to increase the participation of adolescents with reduced mobility in leisure/recreational pursuits. Occupational therapists collaborate with adolescents to identify 3 goals and use coaching to support adolescents, and if appropriate, their parents, to identify aspects of the environment which either support or create barriers to participation and implement strategies to remove barriers. The program addresses one goal at a time in a staged fashion and progress and outcome measurement is embedded in the program. PREP has been evaluated in Canada with adolescents with moderate physical disabilities and shown to be feasible and effective for increasing participation. We plan to evaluate the implementation of PREP in i) an Australian cultural context, ii) a hospital clinic environment and iii) with an older group, that is, youth aged 18 to 30 (approximately) who are part of the Young Adult Complex Disability Services clinic (YACDS) at St Vincent’s Hospital in Melbourne. Our hypothesis is that PREP, following any modifications required for the Australian context, can improve the participation outcomes of young adults with complex disability.
Interventions
The PREP, designed by Dr Anaby and colleagues in Canada, is a 20-week client-centered intervention. PREP aims to improve individuals’ participation in activities of choice by modifying aspects of their environment, including physical, social, attitudinal and institutional elements. We will study the feasibility of implementing PREP in an Australian context, and evaluate participant outcomes using an interrupted time series design. The PREP protocol involves five steps: (1) Make goals, after which is a 4 week period during which baseline measures are collected; (2) Map out a plan; (3) Make it happen (over a 12 week period); (4) Measure the process and outcomes (weekly, throughout the phases of the study including over a 4 week follow up period) and (5) Move forward to the next goal. The intervention will be delivered by trained and supervised occupational therapy students, and begins with a meeting with the participant at their home or other community location of the participant’s preference. During the first 2-hour meeting, the young person will set three new participation goals or activities that they would like to engage in yet find difficult. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM; Law et al.) will be used to identify participation issues from the young person’s perspective. This process will lead to pinpointing three specific community-based activities that are a priority for the young person to engage in (e.g., drawing, playing a musical instrument, joining a cooking club, participating in a sport). Thereafter, is a 4-week period during which baseline measures are completed. Together with the young person, the interventionist will identify barriers within the environment for engaging in each activity and develop and implement a plan to remove these barriers and to build on supports so that young people can participate in activities of their choice. The 12-week intervention period includes 12 hours of therapy time; a 4-week intervention period is designated for each activity, and involves four therapy sessions, for a total of 12 sessions (4 sessions X 3 activities). Following the 12-week intervention, a further 4 weeks is allocated to follow up assessment. The baseline, intervention and 4-week follow-up periods span 20 weeks. Using an interrupted time series design, data will be collected twice weekly throughout the 20 week period using the COPM Performance scale (rated 1-10) for each of the participants' individualised goals (3 goals per participant). In addition, COPM Satisfaction with Performance will be collected on five occasions: first assessment, at the end of 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks and 20 weeks. Prior to testing the intervention as described, an additional PREP feasibility component will be implemented as follows: First, applicability will be assessed by stakeholder review and revisions made if needed of the PREP materials. This is conducted in partnership with our research advisory partners. Then, perceptions of 3-4 young people with disability and their families/support network, and clinicians about the applicability, acceptability and feasibility of the revised PREP intervention will be assessed qualitatively through mock implementation of the revised PREP and individual and/or group interviews – all completed remotely. Mock implementation involves completing only the first 2 steps of the 5 involved in PREP. The stage adds a methodologically rigorous step enabling a stronger evaluation of the revised PREP prior to implementation as an intervention package in 2021. The Mock interviews will be undertaken using videoconferencing technology to be COVID-19 safe, and are anticipated to take 40-60 minutes. The Mock interviews will be delivered by the occupational therapy student under the supervision of a qualified therapist and audio-recorded for later analysis.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Young Adults aged 18-30 years who are interested and able to engage in the research and are able to formulate, communicate and rate their goals with their usual supports (e.g., communication aids/devices and support persons if needed). These individuals may have any of a variety of diagnoses, including, but not limited to, cerebral palsy. 2. Other stakeholders include interested family members or support persons of the young adult participants, and clinicians (predominantly the occupational therapists or student occupational therapists) working at St Vincent’s YACDS who engage in supporting the delivery of the PREP program and are interested to provide their perspectives about feasibility in qualitative interviews.
Exclusion criteria
1. Youth who are recovering within the first year following a severe brain injury or an orthopaedic surgery will be excluded, as their functional capacities are less likely to be stable and any effects from PREP may not be fully attributable to PREP intervention.