None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
Sales of wearable technology have grown exponentially over the last few years. The latest generation devices promise the ability to diagnose a common abnormal rhythm, atrial fibrillation (AF) which is a leading cause of stroke. However, data on the accuracy of these diagnoses has not been validated in clinical trials. Our study aims to assess the accuracy of 2 commercially available smart watches for diagnosing AF compared to the gold standard 12 lead ECG. 200 participants will be recruited from the cardiology outpatient clinic. Those over 65 years of age will be included. Exclusion criteria will be: Participants <65 years, unable to provide consent, presence of pacemaker, non-ambulatory participants and those unable to record an ECG on the smart watch (eg. tremor, arthritis). Recordings will be taken from each watch and a 12 lead ECG acquired during the same session. The accuracy of each watch for diagnosing AF and sinus rhythm will be compared to the 12 lead ECG. A brief survey will also be given to each participant. Baseline characteristics including cardiovascular risk factors, history of arrhythmia's and medication use will be noted.
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
>65 years of age Participants at Eastern Health who are attending cardiology clinic
Exclusion criteria
<65years of age Participants not consenting for the study Participants with permanent pacemakers Participants that are not able to ambulate Participants inability to rest their fingers on the single lead ECG monitor (eg: patients with tremor, arthritis)