Skip to content

A randomised trial comparing Adductor Canal plus Obturator Posterior nerve blocks to Femoral nerve block for Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction

A randomised trial comparing Adductor Canal plus Obturator Posterior nerve blocks to Femoral nerve block for Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12619000873123
Enrollment
61
Registered
2019-06-19
Start date
2016-10-24
Completion date
2018-08-07
Last updated
2019-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare blockade of the adductor canal and the posterior branch of the obturator nerve to blockade of the femoral nerve for patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The primary outcome is pain, measured as opioid consumption and pain scores during the first 24 postoperative hours. The secondary outcome is quadriceps strength.

Interventions

Adductor canal plus obturator posterior nerve blocks as part of anaesthetic for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Adductor canal block performed using 7.5ml of 0.75% ropivicaine. Obturator posterior nerve block performed using 7.5ml of 0.75% ropivicaine, and performed at the same time as the adductor canal block. Both injections were single dose perineural injections via a 21-G, 100 mm long SonoPlex needle, and performed with ultrasound guidance (Sono-Site M-Turbo ultrasoun

Adductor canal plus obturator posterior nerve blocks as part of anaesthetic for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Adductor canal block performed using 7.5ml of 0.75% ropivicaine. Obturator posterior nerve block performed using 7.5ml of 0.75% ropivicaine, and performed at the same time as the adductor canal block. Both injections were single dose perineural injections via a 21-G, 100 mm long SonoPlex needle, and performed with ultrasound guidance (Sono-Site M-Turbo ultrasound unit) in an operating theatre during monitored anaesthetic care prior to the start of surgery. Examination of fidelity to the intervention undertaken via examination of the anaesthetic record (scanned paper copy available on electronic patient health record).

Sponsors

Perry Fabian
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients 16 years of age and older scheduled to undergo arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at one of two hospitals in our health network.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who refused consent, had an allergy to local anesthetic drugs, had a contraindication to regional anesthesia, or had a history of treatment for a chronic pain disorder.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026