Skip to content

A pilot study comparing the zero-heat-flux temperature monitoring device to oesophageal temperature monitoring in orthopaedic surgery.

A comparison of non-invasive zero-heat-flux thermometry with invasive oesophageal measurements for consistent perioperative temperature monitoring: a pilot study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12619000842167
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-06-12
Start date
2018-11-26
Completion date
2019-07-03
Last updated
2020-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The overall aim of this study is to improve methods of temperature monitoring for patients undergoing surgery. There are concerns about how accurate the most commonly used, non- invasive methods of temperature monitoring are. The most accurate methods of measuring core temperature are very invasive, and therefore not routinely used for all patients undergoing surgery. Accurate and consistent measurement of temperature is important when patients are undergoing surgery to detect abnormal temperatures including fever, and perioperative hypothermia – that is, a very low temperature related to undergoing surgery and anaesthesia. Perioperative hypothermia is linked with range of adverse side effects. Therefore, it is very important that health care staff monitor temperature using the most effective, yet practical and safe mode of measurement. This study specifically seeks to test the zero-heat-flux temperature monitoring device (Bair HuggerTM). The device will be tested in comparison to oesophageal temperature monitoring, which involves the insertion of a temperature monitoring probe into the oesophagus. This is often undertaken as part of routine care, as this method is considered an accurate method of core temperature measurement. The zero-heat- flux device is completely non-invasive, yet existing research suggests that it may offer greater accuracy in monitoring core temperature than other non-invasive devices in use. This study will assess the accuracy of the device, ability to detect hypothermia, as well as assessing the feasibility of a larger trial of the clinical application of the device. This device will be compared with the standard of care (oesophageal) device and all participants will receive both forms of monitoring.

Interventions

a) Description of the device. The study will compare the zero heat flux monitoring device (Bair Hugger™, 3M, St Paul, MN) to oesophageal temperature monitoring (DeRoyal™, Powell, TN . The zero-heat-flux device (Bair Hugger™, 3M, St Paul, MN) measures tissue temperature at 1-2cm below the skin surface of the forehead, and this is considered to approximate core temperature. The device is comprised of a thermal insulator placed on the skin, and covered by an electric heater. Heat flow through the i

a) Description of the device. The study will compare the zero heat flux monitoring device (Bair Hugger™, 3M, St Paul, MN) to oesophageal temperature monitoring (DeRoyal™, Powell, TN . The zero-heat-flux device (Bair Hugger™, 3M, St Paul, MN) measures tissue temperature at 1-2cm below the skin surface of the forehead, and this is considered to approximate core temperature. The device is comprised of a thermal insulator placed on the skin, and covered by an electric heater. Heat flow through the insulator is eliminated by the servo-control of the heater, so that the heater and skin temperature becomes equal. Oesophageal temperature monitoring will be achieved by utilising a temperature probe inserted utilizing videolargyngoscopy to a distance of 15cm to ensure placement in the oesophagus at the time of intubation. b) Procedures Preoperative phase: On arrival to the pre-operative holding area, and prior to the induction of anaesthesia, the Research Nurse will attach the zero heat flux monitoring Bair Hugger™ device to the forehead, above the orbital ridge. After a ramp-up time of 3 minutes, temperature data will be retrieved from the control unit at 15 minute intervals by the research assistant (Research Nurse). Device failure and other adverse events will be recorded. Intraoperative phase: after transfer to the operating theatre, and during induction of anaesthesia, an oesophageal temperature monitoring (DeRoyal™) probe will be inserted in the distal oesophagus near the left atrium by the study anaesthetist. After adequate measurement depth is confirmed, the probe will be secured with the endotracheal tube. Standard monitoring, including electrocardiogram (ECG), pulse oximetry and non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) will also be attached, as per usual care. General anaesthesia will commence in accordance with the study anaesthetic protocol developed in agreement with anaesthetic medical staff. Bladder temperature monitoring will be conducted via the indwelling urinary catheter, only if forming part of routine planned care for each participant. All patients will be covered with a warmed cotton blanket, receive fluid warming to 38.5°C via fluid warmer and full or partial body forced air warming, dependent upon surgical site, commencing at 47°C and then automatically decreasing to 45°C , as per the study protocol (and as per the normal operating function of the Covidien Warm Touch™ forced air warmer). Ambient temperature will be recorded. Postoperative phase: zero-heat-flux monitoring will continue upon transfer to the Post Anaesthetic Care Unit (PACU) and data will be recorded upon admission by the Research Nurse. Ambient temperature, warming interventions and acceptability of the device (from the patient’s perspective) will be assessed. c) Who will deliver the intervention The Research Nurse will attach the zero heat flux device and the anaesthetist will insert the oesophageal temperature monitoring probe. d) Mode of delivery Not applicable - see details above. e) Number of times intervention delivered & over what period of time. The zero heat flux device is attached preoperatively and will remain in place until admission to the Post Anaesthetic Care Unit. Oesophageal temperature monitoring remains in place only during general anaesthesia. f) Setting where the intervention occurs In the perioperative suite: in the preoperative holding area, through surgery and into the Post Anaesthetic Care Unit. g) Strategies used to assess adherence to the intervention Details of insertion and attachment of devices, as well as device failure, will be recorded.

Sponsors

Queensland University of Technology
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Single group
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery Endotracheal tube placement with oesophageal temperature monitoring General anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Forehead/neck rash or infection Unexpected blood loss Oesophageal varices American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score >III Patients not expected to receive endotracheal tube placement Surgery under neuraxial anaesthesia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026