Skip to content

Photobiomodulation therapy for muscle damage and fatigue following electrical stimulation - a controlled trial

The effect of low level laser irradiation on oxidative stress, muscle damage and fatigue following neuromuscular electrical stimulation - a double blind, cross-over trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12619000678190
Enrollment
24
Registered
2019-05-06
Start date
2015-05-15
Completion date
2015-05-25
Last updated
2019-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is considered a standard, physiotherapeutic and training intervention, utilised for restoring, preserving or improving muscle strength and functional capacities, from different health conditions to athlete training. Nonetheless, NMES may lead to prolonged muscle soreness and even to excessive muscle damage. Low level laser therapy (LLLT) is among novel methods for preventing and treating of exercise induced muscle damage and soreness. This is the first randomised, double blind crossover trial to evaluate effects of LLLT on muscle fatigue and recovery after a single session of NMES in healthy, moderately active men.

Interventions

A single session of low level laser therapy (LLLT) irradiations, of an approximate duration of 18 minutes, provided by a physiotherapist, in six skin areas (25 cm2 each, with direct contact of the probe to skin, with slight pressure), i.e. 5 cm above the middle of the line connecting the anterior superior iliac spine and the base of patella and 5 cm below that spot, in two areas above the vastus medialis muscle belly, and in two areas above the vastus lateralis muscle belly. The dose of 30 J (pr

A single session of low level laser therapy (LLLT) irradiations, of an approximate duration of 18 minutes, provided by a physiotherapist, in six skin areas (25 cm2 each, with direct contact of the probe to skin, with slight pressure), i.e. 5 cm above the middle of the line connecting the anterior superior iliac spine and the base of patella and 5 cm below that spot, in two areas above the vastus medialis muscle belly, and in two areas above the vastus lateralis muscle belly. The dose of 30 J (preventing from the thermal effects to occur) applied in each area (i. e the overall dose of 180 J), with a cluster probe consisting of four semiconducting lasers, 830 nm, of 200 mW each, using BTL 5000 device (BTL Industries Limited, London). The LLLT, or sham LLLT, session was followed by a NMES session, provided by a physiotherapist. It consisted of forty five electrically evoked tetanic, isometric contractions, in the 5 sec. ON, 15 sec. OFF mode, with 1.5 sec. ramp-on and 0.5 sec. ramp-off times (15 minutes overall time of the NMES session). NMES was performed with the use of a stationary electrical stimulator Sonicator Plus 940 (Mettler Electronics Corporation, USA), generating pulsed, two-phase, 300 µs, square-wave, symmetrical, delivered at 80 Hz, current. Four (two electric circuits) round, self-adhesive, 5 cm diameter electrodes were placed over motor points, on previously rinsed with alcohol and dried skin The current intensity was set at the level of tolerance (below pain threshold) and adjusted by the physiotherapist to that level when needed during the session. There are no strategies used to assess or monitor fidelity to this study. At the first stage of this crossover study, group 1 (n=12) received NMES and LLLT, while group 2 (n=12) received NMES and sham LLLT. A reverse procedure was applied after an eight-day wash-out period, sufficient to eliminate the carryover effect.

Sponsors

Józef Pilsudski University of Physical Education, Warsaw
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Crossover
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Age
20 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Healthy, moderatey physically active participants. The moderate physical activity level as defined in the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): “doing some activity more than likely equivalent to half an hour of at least moderate intensity physical activity on most days”. Healthy, i.e. free from medical conditions, such as lower limb injuries within a year prior to the study, current inflammation and contraindications to NMES or LLLT.

Exclusion criteria

routine, intensive, competitive physical activity; sedentary lifestyle; lower limb injuries within a year prior to the study; current inflammation; contraindications to NMES or LLLT.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026