Skip to content

Palmitoylethanolamide for the treatment of centralised chronic pain

Palmitoylethanolamide for the treatment of chronic nociplastic pain: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12619000418178
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-03-14
Start date
2019-04-15
Completion date
2020-02-28
Last updated
2019-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Chronic low level inflammation within the central nervous system (CNS) is increasingly being recognised as a potential contributor to many types of persistent pain. Through the activation of glia, especially microglia and astrocytes, it is thought that alterations in synaptic function lead to changes in the way that pain is processed within the CNS. It is believed that these changes play a significant part in the development of central sensitisation. There is also evidence that this glial activation may also account for many of the neuro-vegetative features common in persistent pain such as anxiety, depression, fatigue, poor sleep and cognitive problems. It is hoped that medicines that are able to suppress CNS inflammation might help relieve pain, improve function and associated psychiatric symptoms in patients with chronic pain. Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) is a naturally occurring fatty acid involved with known anti-inflammatory properties and has been suggested to be involved in the regulation and termination of inflammatory responses within the CNS. It is currently classed as a nutraceutical and available from compounding chemists without prescription. There is some evidence that administration of PEA has analgesic benefits in a variety of causes of persistent pain, although evidence is limited by significant industry support. It does have anecdotal evidence of positive effects and appears to be very well tolerated, with a low risk of serious adverse effects. Given the limitations in current pharmacologic options in the management of persistent pain, it represents a potential useful addition to the current therapeutic options. The aim of this study is to assess the ability of daily oral administration of PEA to achieve long lasting improvements pain and function in patients being treated in a tertiary hospital pain clinic. Patients will be selected based on evidence of neuro- vegetative features as assessed by the Symptom Severity Score (SSS ) from the 2011 revised ACR Fibromyalgia Criteria regardless of primary pain diagnosis. The study aims to have high external validity. Patients will be randomised to PEA or placebo in addition to their current therapy for a period of 6 months. Outcomes will be assessed via the electronic Persistent Pain Outcomes Collaborative (ePPOC) questionnaires, with a primary outcome of Pain Interference as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at 6 months.

Interventions

Palmitoylethanolamide 300mg capsules. 300mg orally twice daily for 2 weeks then 600mg orally twice daily for further 24 weeks. Patients will be reviewed at 3 months and 6 months and asked to bring in medications to monitor adherence.

Sponsors

Daniel Ellyard
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

• Chronic pain at least 3 months duration AND • Evidence of centralised pain/ neuroinflammatory response as evidenced by Symptom Severity Score (from Fibromyalgia Survey Score) greater than or equal to 7/12 AND • Average pain intensity as measured by modified BPI greater than or equal to 5/10 (moderate or severe) AND • Pain interference as measure by BPI greater than or equal to 5/10 (moderate or severe)

Exclusion criteria

• Daily opioids > 120 OME • Planned procedural intervention within 6 months • Pre-study use of PEA • Workers compensation or other ongoing compensation claim • Major psychiatric disease (BPAD, Psychosis, PTSD) • Pregnancy or breastfeeding • Non-English speaking • Cognitive impairment significant enough to impair informed consent

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026