Skip to content

Miller vs Macintosh size 0 and 1 blades for tracheal intubation of infants under 6 months: a randomized comparative study

Miller vs Macintosh size 0 and 1 blades for tracheal intubation of infants under 6 months: a randomized comparative study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12619000151134
Acronym
MMT
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-02-01
Start date
2016-06-27
Completion date
2017-06-26
Last updated
2019-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The aim of the present study is to compare the glottis views with the size 0 and 1 Macintosh and Miller laryngoscope blades above and below the epiglottis. the study was designed observational prospective comparative study.

Interventions

Forty children undergoing elective surgery will be enrolled in the study. Infants will be randomized (using www.random.com) into two groups, the Miller and Macintosh blade groups, and whether the assigned blade is inserted above or below the epiglottis first, with allocation stored within sealed opaque envelopes until consent is obtained. The straight Miller laryngoscope blade is traditionally recommended for intubation in infants, due to the large size and flexibility of the infant and the Maci

Forty children undergoing elective surgery will be enrolled in the study. Infants will be randomized (using www.random.com) into two groups, the Miller and Macintosh blade groups, and whether the assigned blade is inserted above or below the epiglottis first, with allocation stored within sealed opaque envelopes until consent is obtained. The straight Miller laryngoscope blade is traditionally recommended for intubation in infants, due to the large size and flexibility of the infant and the Macintosh is the predominate model of the curved blade types. After standart anesthesia induction the assigned blade will be inserted into the mouth. All laryngoscopies will be performed by one of three paediatric anaesthetists. The Miller blade will be inserted into the mouth at the right commissure and the tongue swept gently to the left. The best laryngeal view will be achieved by optimizing the head position and applying external pressure to the larynx. As described by Passi et al., two laryngeal views will be obtained with the same blade in each patient: lifting the epiglottis or the tongue base. The order of the views (lifting the epiglottis or the tongue base) will be determined by randomization immediately before laryngoscopy. The laryngeal views will be photographed each time by an anaesthetist using a digital Olympus camera without using flash. The camera will be optimally positioned before laryngoscopy in order to capture the best possible views. The photos will be reviewed by a blinded anaesthetist using the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score . This anaesthetist will be blinded to the study hypothesis as well as which blade was used and where it was placed. We will photo the child’s name and the randomization code—blade type and which view was taken before and after each photo of the larynx. Then the photos will be uploaded and the number of the photo will be recorded in the study record for the child so we will know which photo corresponds to which blade and position for each child. After all the photos are taken, they will be randomized and given to the blinded observer to measure the vocal cord span.

Sponsors

Kemal Tolga Saracoglu
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Primary purpose
Treatment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
No minimum to 6 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

ASA I or II patients Children under 6 months Children undergoing surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Children with a history of a difficult airway Children with diagnosed congenital syndrome, Infants less than 37 weeks gestational age at birth, Children with acute or chronic pulmonary or neuromuscular diseases

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026