Skip to content

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) vs wound infiltration for colonic surgery

Comparison of Ultrasound guided Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) block to wound infiltration (WI) for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic colonic surgery- Prospective randomized study.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12619000113156
Enrollment
72
Registered
2019-01-24
Start date
2019-03-19
Completion date
2020-09-07
Last updated
2021-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The study will be conducted at the CALHN sites comprising The Queen Elizabeth Hospital and Royal Adelaide Hospital with patients who are scheduled for elective laparoscopic colonic surgery. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of wound infiltration over the newer regional analgesic technique called erector spinae block (ESP) block for the postoperative analgesia.Efficiency is assessed by comparing pain scores, analgesics use and other outcomes measures analysed are, discharge time and clinical determinants of adverse effects. We hypothesize; that ultrasound-guided ESP block is superior to surgically guided wound infiltration in providing superior pain relief without major side effects.

Interventions

: Erector spinae plane (ESP) block Technique: It is single shot technique performed by anaesthetist ( one of the investigators) at the end of the surgical procedure in theatre. An in plane approach in the lateral position will be attempted under the ultrasound guidance. Using a 6- to 15-MHz high-frequency linear probe, Erector spinae (ES) muscles will be visualized at T8 transverse process 22g needle will be used to locate ES, after saline test dose 3mg/kg of ropivacaine (0.5%, 20 mL per side) w

: Erector spinae plane (ESP) block Technique: It is single shot technique performed by anaesthetist ( one of the investigators) at the end of the surgical procedure in theatre. An in plane approach in the lateral position will be attempted under the ultrasound guidance. Using a 6- to 15-MHz high-frequency linear probe, Erector spinae (ES) muscles will be visualized at T8 transverse process 22g needle will be used to locate ES, after saline test dose 3mg/kg of ropivacaine (0.5%, 20 mL per side) will be administered. This ESP block is monitored in recovery room and assessed how effective in providing post operative pain relief in colorectal surgery.

Sponsors

The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

ASA 1-3 for laparoscopic colonic surgery under general anaesthesia between the age of 18-85 yrs.

Exclusion criteria

Inability to cooperate, allergy to any drug used in the study, preoperative daily use of opioids, pregnancy or conversion to open surgery. Patients receiving epidural, or on regular opioid medication or any other medication for chronic pain management

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026