Skip to content

A comparison of intubation success in difficult intubation cases: The use of a Frova intubation catheter versus a Bonfils intubation fiberoscope

A comparison of intubation success in difficult intubation cases: The use of a Frova intubation catheter versus a Bonfils intubation fiberoscope

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12619000058178
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-01-16
Start date
2016-01-01
Completion date
2017-11-01
Last updated
2019-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

A difficult airway is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in patients who undergo surgical interventions. Therefore, many devices and algorithms have been developed for the management of a difficult airway. The aim of this study was to compare the success of two devices, a Frova catheter (FC) and Bonfils fiberoscope (BF), in difficult intubation cases. Methods: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I–III patients aged 18–65 y who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia and were considered as difficult intubation cases were included in the study. The patients were randomized into two groups, depending on the device used for intubation, with 30 patients in each group.

Interventions

The Bonfils fiberscope (BF) (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) is a hard, long, thin device, with a curved end. During intubation, a tracheal tube (TT) is placed in the shaft of the (BF) and inserted into the patient’s mouth. The Frova Intubating Introducer (FC) (Cook U.K. Limited, Letchworth, Hertfordshire, U.K.) was introduced into clinical practice in 1998. The (FC) is a gum flexible bougie and offers improved endotracheal intubation. Its distal tip bends anteriorly at 30°, thereby improving e

The Bonfils fiberscope (BF) (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) is a hard, long, thin device, with a curved end. During intubation, a tracheal tube (TT) is placed in the shaft of the (BF) and inserted into the patient’s mouth. The Frova Intubating Introducer (FC) (Cook U.K. Limited, Letchworth, Hertfordshire, U.K.) was introduced into clinical practice in 1998. The (FC) is a gum flexible bougie and offers improved endotracheal intubation. Its distal tip bends anteriorly at 30°, thereby improving endotracheal biting of the instrument and allowing the instrument to be used with ease and without trauma. Patients were undergoing elective surgical procedures requiring tracheal intubation, and had been involved in at least one intubation attempt that had been deemed unsuccessful and was performed by an anaesthetist who has at least three years of experience were randomized to tracheal intubation with the Macintosh laryngoscope (size 3 blade in females; size 4 in males) used with the Frova intubation catheter (Group FC) or the Bonfils intubation fiberscope (Group BF). In cases when intubations could not be carried out with the chosen device at the third attempt by an anaesthetist with at least three years of experience, the device was considered to be unsuccessful and intubation was attempted with the second device. When this method also proved unsuccessful, airway management based upon the difficult airway algorithm was maintained. As a third method, the combined use of both devices or intubation with a fibreoptic bronchoscope was preferred.

Sponsors

Selcuk University
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

We studied 50 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–III patients, aged 18-65. These cases were undergoing elective surgical procedures requiring tracheal intubation and general anaesthesia, and had been involved in at least one intubation attempt that had been deemed unsuccessful and was performed by an anaesthetist who has at least three years of experience.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who were pregnant, emergency cases, those younger than 18 years, those who had gastroesophageal reflux and delayed gastric emptying, and patients with severe pulmonary disease were excluded.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026