Skip to content

A randomized controlled trial of the Rapid symptom shifting therapy - part 2

A trial of rapid symptom shift therapy compared with an inactive control intervention for participants with significant anxiety.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12618001994279
Acronym
TROSSMB2
Enrollment
127
Registered
2018-12-12
Start date
2019-01-07
Completion date
2019-12-24
Last updated
2019-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The Primary purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of a technique called the rapid symptom shift which gets participants to push their anxiety to the horizon (visually) in order to make them feel less stressed. This study will be done as a parallel design randomised trial. The study hypothesis is that the rapid symptom shift is more effective than the control condition where there is no symptom shift (just sitting for 3 minutes)

Interventions

The intervention will be the rapid symptom shift. The intervention group will receive the Rapid Symptom Shift which is based on neurolinguistics programming concepts. The interviewer asks the patient if they can describe where their anxiety is in space. While this may seem an unusual request, patients often have no difficulty in explaining where it is located. They are asked to describe their anxiety in terms of colour and shape. In almost all cases they say it is close but has no shape and a va

The intervention will be the rapid symptom shift. The intervention group will receive the Rapid Symptom Shift which is based on neurolinguistics programming concepts. The interviewer asks the patient if they can describe where their anxiety is in space. While this may seem an unusual request, patients often have no difficulty in explaining where it is located. They are asked to describe their anxiety in terms of colour and shape. In almost all cases they say it is close but has no shape and a variety of colours. Then they are asked to change the shape to a circle and put it in front of them. They are then asked what a “safe” colour for them is and to make the circle that colour. That image is then moved away visually and pushed to the horizon where it is stood up like a 50 cent piece. They are asked to then make it a 10 cent piece and put it face down so it is not visible. At this point they are asked how they feel about their “anxiety or stress’ and this visualisation from experience in the clinic almost always provides a positive response. The moving of the image to the horizon we think is the essential difference between the intervention and the control intervention. The mode of the interview delivery will be face to face on a one to one basis. It is done once only and lasts about 3 minutes. The interview will be conducted private clinics. The comparison condition is just sitting doing nothing. This sessions will last 3 minutes and they are done once only. The interviewer will use the remote randomisation to choose the intervention or the comparison intervention. The interviewers will include a medical doctor, a counsellor and therapists trained in neurolinguistic programming.

Sponsors

University of Auckland
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
16 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Able to read and write English and understand the information sheet. Age 16 to 80 Gender Both males and females STAI (state anxiety score) of greater than or equal to 35

Exclusion criteria

Key exclusion criteria Unable to comprehend the information sheet and the consent form

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026