Skip to content

A comparison of handheld point of care ultrasonography to standard portable ultrasonography for identifying an optimal site for pleurocentesis in patients with pleural effusions

A comparison of handheld point of care ultrasonography to standard portable ultrasonography for identifying an optimal site for pleurocentesis in patients with pleural effusions

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12618001592235
Enrollment
54
Registered
2018-09-25
Start date
2017-05-26
Completion date
2018-04-06
Last updated
2018-10-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Ultrasound assessment has improved the safety and accuracy of pleural procedures. Highly portable handheld ultrasound technology been developed, however has not been validated for this purpose. The aim of this study is to examine the ability of handheld ultrasound to determine a safe site for pleurocentesis. We hypothesize that the handheld ultrasound will be equivalent to the standard ultrasound.

Interventions

We will examine whether a highly portable handheld ultrasound would be able to determine a safe site with a standard point of care ultrasound used as the gold standard for diagnostic pleurocentesis. In this study, we will perform paired ultrasound assessments of patients with pleural effusions who are referred for diagnostic pleurocentesis. The intervention involves the patient undergoing two ultrasound assessments by a respiratory fellow and respiratory physician. The handheld ultrasound ass

We will examine whether a highly portable handheld ultrasound would be able to determine a safe site with a standard point of care ultrasound used as the gold standard for diagnostic pleurocentesis. In this study, we will perform paired ultrasound assessments of patients with pleural effusions who are referred for diagnostic pleurocentesis. The intervention involves the patient undergoing two ultrasound assessments by a respiratory fellow and respiratory physician. The handheld ultrasound assessment is performed prior to the standard ultrasound assessment and takes approximately 5 to 10 minutes. This involves ultrasound gel on the side of the chest and the probe placed on the chest of the patient. A second assessor then performs the same ultrasound assessment with the standard ultrasound machine which also takes 5 to 10 minutes with the participant seated in the same location. Treatment will not be changed by the handheld ultrasound as the standard ultrasound will be used as the gold standard. The respiratory fellow and respiratory physician will be alternately allocated to either the handheld ultrasound or standard ultrasound machine.

Sponsors

Flinders Medical Centre
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Single group
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Stable consecutive patients, both inpatients and outpatients, with pleural effusions requiring diagnostic pleurocentesis alone or followed by therapeutic pleurocentesis, intercostal chest drain or indwelling tunnelled pleural catheter insertion will be prospectively recruited for this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria include those patients on antiplatelet agents within the last seven days, anticoagulants or with an INR >1.5, pregnant patients, respiratory failure, platelet count of <100, patients unable to give informed consent

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026