Skip to content

Testing the reliability of a scale for the measurement of variety-support for adolescents in Physical Education lessons.

Testing the reliability of a scale for the measurement of variety-support for adolescents in Physical Education lessons.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12618001242213
Enrollment
140
Registered
2018-07-23
Start date
2018-08-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study is to test the test-retest reliability ad validity of a new scale created to measure the variety support received by students in their PE classes.

Interventions

The aim of this study is to test the reliability of a scale for the measurement of variety-support for adolescents. (Variety Support definition - a social contextual concept whereby interpersonal factors facilitate a diverse range of tasks, actions, and opportunities.) Phase 1: Variety-Support Scale Development The Basic Needs Satisfaction in Sport Scale (BNSSS) 80 has commonly been used and is validated for measuring the psychological needs of adolescents. The BNSSS currently assesses the thr

The aim of this study is to test the reliability of a scale for the measurement of variety-support for adolescents. (Variety Support definition - a social contextual concept whereby interpersonal factors facilitate a diverse range of tasks, actions, and opportunities.) Phase 1: Variety-Support Scale Development The Basic Needs Satisfaction in Sport Scale (BNSSS) 80 has commonly been used and is validated for measuring the psychological needs of adolescents. The BNSSS currently assesses the three constructs of autonomy, competence and relatedness in relation to sport. A variety-support scale will be developed for use with the BNSSS and will involve three steps: Step 1 - Item development: This step involves developing potential items for assessing variety- support and determining their content validity. Based on CI Lubans and CI Lonsdale’s previous work, 30 experts in SDT will be invited to assess the content validity of the scale using established methods (experts work in fields of physical activity, education, psychology and/or Self Determination Theory). After the experts are provided with conceptual definitions of the underlying constructs (i.e. variety support vs perceived variety) they will be asked to examine the items and rate the degree to which each item matches the content using the following 5-point Likert scale: 1 = Poor match to 5 = Excellent match. Experts will also be asked to comment on the overall utility of the measure and to provide feedback for improvement. One final variety support scale will be produced at the conclusion of this step. Step 2: Factorial validity analysis: The primary aim of this step is to establish the factorial validity of the variety-support scale in a sample of adolescents. We will recruit Grade 8 students (n=140) from NSW secondary Public schools once study approval is obtained from the relevant human ethics committees and the school principals. Participants must have informed signed consent from a parent or guardian. Sample size greater than 100 is recommended. Adolescents will answer the scale questionnaire, taking approx 5 minutes to complete. They will answer the questionnaire a single time for each version of the scale. Step 3: Test-retest reliability analysis: The aim of this step is to determine the test–retest reliability of the final variety-support scale in a sample of adolescent boys and girls (N = 80) attending a school not involved in step 2. Adolescents will complete the variety-support scale on two occasions (1-week apart) to assess test-retest reliability. Aikens and critical values will be used to test the internal validity of scale items.

Sponsors

The University of Newcastle, Australia
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Primary purpose
Educational / counselling / training

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
13 Years to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Participants must be aged 13-14 years and attending a public NSW High School. Participants must have informed signed consent from a parent or guardian and be proficient readers/writers of the English language. Participants must also be able to actively participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity.

Exclusion criteria

No exclusion criteria.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026