None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
Front-of-pack labels (FoPLs) are used in many countries as a tool to increase consumers’ awareness of the nutritional quality of food products and encourage consumption of healthier food. Many different types of FoPLs exist and the design of each influences its effectiveness (e.g., how favourably it is perceived, how easy it is to understand, how likely it is to be incorporated into food decisions). The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of and people’s perceptions of 5 different FoPLs used around the world: Health Star Rating system, Multiple Traffic Light system, Nutri-Score, References Intakes label and Warning symbol. Attitudes, understanding and influence on food choice will be assessed for each of these labels via an online survey in 12 countries: Argentina, Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Mexico, Singapore, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America.
Interventions
Participants will complete an online survey (hosted by an ISO accredited web panel provider) taking approximately 15 – 20 minutes. They will first be asked a series of socio-demographic questions before making decisions about fictional food products. Specifically, they will see 3 versions (1 healthy, 1 moderately healthy and 1 unhealthy) of 3 foods (breakfast cereals, cakes and pizzas) and will engage in a choice task followed by a ranking task for each set of 3 food products. In the choice task, respondents will choose from each set which product they would prefer to buy. An “I wouldn’t buy any of these products” option will also be available. Following the choice task, respondents will be asked to rank the 3 products from most to least healthy. An “I don’t know” option will also be included. Respondents will then be randomly assigned to one of the five front-of-pack label (FoPL) conditions; Health Star Rating system (HSR), Multiple Traffic Light (MTL) system, Nutri-Score, Reference Intakes (RIs) label, and Warning symbols. The same three sets of products shown in the control condition will be presented but this time with the randomly allocated FoPL present on the mock packages. Respondents will complete the same choice and ranking tasks from the control condition. Order effects will be controlled for by randomizing the presentation order of the products. Finally, respondents will be asked their perceptions of the FoPL they saw. A picture of the label will be shown and they will be asked whether they remember seeing the label on the food products shown in the survey. This will be followed by a series of questions asking about attitudes to the FOP label assessing liking (e.g. “I like this label”), usefulness (e.g. “This FoP label is useful”), awareness (e.g. “This FoP label stands out”), and perceived cognitive workload (e.g. “This label is easy to understand”). Each question will be rated on a 9-point Likert scale ranging from “Strongly disagree” to “Strongly agree”.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Respondents must be aged 18 and over and must reside in one of the following countries: Argentina, Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Mexico, Singapore, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America.
Exclusion criteria
Demographic quotas based on age, sex, income and location will be used. Participants will be excluded if the quota bracket which they belong in has been filled.