Skip to content

Improving smartphone use after brain injury

A comparison of systematic instruction and error-based techniques to train the use of smartphone memory apps in people with acquired brain injury: A phase II RCT

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12618001066279
Enrollment
38
Registered
2018-06-26
Start date
2018-11-01
Completion date
2020-03-30
Last updated
2022-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The effectiveness of external compensatory aids, such as smartphones and the use of apps, for improving performance in activities requiring memory has been widely supported. Despite this, smartphone adoption in memory rehabilitation has been low, likely due to the insufficient training that professionals receive for teaching compensatory strategies and the limited evidence regarding the most effective training methods. Two training approaches have traditionally been used to teach new skills in rehabilitation: Trial-and-error and techniques minimising errors (which have been grouped as "Systematic Instruction" approach). Both methods have produced mixed results in studies targeting the learning of electronic aids, thus indicating that further evidence is needed. Additionally, samples in existing studies have usually included mixed brain injured populations, thus limiting the applicability of results to stroke individuals. A relatively recently developed teaching technique, error-based learning, has emerged using self-regulatory skills training to teach individuals to frequently stop, check and modify their actions to correct errors while they are learning a new skill. This method has shown to be promising for learning everyday life skills in traumatic brain injury populations, but its efficacy has never been explored with stroke individuals or in teaching the use of a smartphone. The main objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of three training methods (Systematic Instruction-SI, Error-Based Learning-EBL, Trial and error-TEL) for training the use of an app in a smartphone, in people with acquired brain injury presenting with memory complaints. It is predicted that participants trained under SI and EBL will be more proficient than those trained with TEL at each time-point Other secondary aims of this study are to determine: 1. Whether learned skills are generalised to untrained apps: EBL will result in better generalisation of skills to untrained apps, and both SI and TEL will have limited generalisation and wont differ between them. 2. Whether the training increases the frequency of use of smartphone, in general and as a memory aid. 3. Whether the training in an app increases the memory self-efficacy of the user and the confidence to use a smartphone. There is no specific hypothesis for the last 2 aims, due to their exploratory nature

Interventions

Systematic Instruction Under this approach, participants will be taught to use an app (Cozi Family Organiser) using a training method that aims to prevent and minimise error commission during learning. Procedure: All participants will have an initial session where baseline measures (smartphone ability, neuropsychological measures and self-report questionnaires) will be administered. Following this, participants will be randomly allocated to one of the groups. Training will take place in the se

Systematic Instruction Under this approach, participants will be taught to use an app (Cozi Family Organiser) using a training method that aims to prevent and minimise error commission during learning. Procedure: All participants will have an initial session where baseline measures (smartphone ability, neuropsychological measures and self-report questionnaires) will be administered. Following this, participants will be randomly allocated to one of the groups. Training will take place in the second session. The functionalities of the app and their real-life applications will be explained at the beginning of each of four scenarios. Then the trainer will model step by step the correct performance of the task in his/her own smartphone, while the participant follows and repeats the steps in his/her own smartphone. Trainers then provide direct instructions with different levels of prompting (which include full verbal explanation + modelling, verbal explanation + pointing, confirmation of a correct query, and no environmental support), according to the participant's progress. Under this method, errors are prevented as much as possible and if they occur the participant is stopped, and immediate corrective feedback is given. Each task is repeated until 95% of the steps are completed without cuing. Only then, the next scenario will be introduced. A total of four scenarios will be presented and the skills that will be taught include: creating, modifying and sharing a shopping list, creating and modifying an event in the calendar and making use of the smartphone while on a phone call. At the end of the training session there will be a post-training test in which the participant will be asked to independently complete tasks, similar to the ones practiced before. There will also be one- and six-week follow-up sessions in which a similar test will be conducted and where other follow-up measures will be taken. Error-based Learning Under this approach, participants will be taught to use an app (Cozi Family Organiser) using a training method that teaches self-regulatory skills, allowing participants to stop, check and modify their actions. Procedure: All participants will have an initial session where baseline measures (smartphone ability, neuropsychological measures and self-report questionnaires) will be administered. Following this, participants will be randomly allocated to one of the groups. Training will take place in the second session. Participants will be encouraged to provide real-life examples where the functionalities of the app would be useful. Then the participant will read the instructions for each task step-by-step, while the trainer provides a correct demonstration. Following this, the trainer allows participants to independently attempt the tasks, to commit errors and to notice and self-correct them. They will only intervene if errors are not immediately self-corrected, in which case participants are stopped and provided with non-specific or/and specific prompts (See next paragraph). Trainer will prompt participants to make self-predictions of performance, to generate strategies for potential difficulties and will encourage a high level of reflection and self-regulation following a Stop, Check and Correct approach. Each task is repeated until 95% of the steps are completed without errors. Only then, the next scenario will be introduced. A total of four scenarios will be presented and the skills that will be taught include: creating, modifying and sharing a shopping list, creating and modifying an event in the calendar and making use of the smartphone while on a phone call. At the end of the training session there will be a post-training test in which the participant will be asked to independently complete tasks, similar to the ones practiced before. There will also be one- and six-weeks follow-up sessions in which a similar test will be conducted and where other follow-up measures will be taken. The prompts that the trainer provides in the Error-based learning condition are guided by the following: 1. If an error is self-corrected the trainer reinforces the participant by emphasising the correct action (Well spotted, you noticed that you had to click “save” before trying to enter the time of the event) 2. If there is no self-correction, trainer immediately provides a non-specific prompt (i.e. can I get you to stop for a moment and check where you are up to in the instructions? [tap sheet]). 2.1 If error is self-corrected, give specific praise (Well done, you need to save that information first before doing that next step) and continue. 2.2 If error is still not self-corrected, a specific prompt is provided (You need to click on “save” on the top right of your screen before trying to enter the time of the event, otherwise the date of the event will disappear) 3. If the person asks a question or seeks reassurance, the trainer smiles encouragingly and gets them to check the instructions (e.g. "check the steps and see what you think - does it seem right to you?") - then provide praise or correction as needed. Materials: All participants will use their own smartphone and will be provided with written scenarios and tasks where they can apply different functionalities of the app. Step-by-step written instructions indicating how to complete each of the trained tasks will also be provided. All three groups will be trained with the same four scenarios. The following is an example of one of the training scenarios: . . You have a doctor’s appointment on the _(Date)__ This is the relevant information of that appointment: 1. The appointment is at the Medical Centre 2. You are going alone to the appointment 3. The appointment is from 10:30 to 11:00 am 4. You have follow-up appointments every Friday and this ends on the _(date)_ 5. You want to set a reminder, 3 hours earlier so you can get ready 6. Every time you go, you need to remember to bring your Medicare card, so you want to make a note about this You close the app after you have finished . . . Trainers: The training sessions will be provided by provisionally registered psychologists who are completing their doctoral programme and who will be trained on how to deliver each training technique. The post-training test and follow-up sessions will be conducted by blinded assessors who could either be provisionally registered psychologists or research assistants (bachelor’s in psychology honours students). Both trainers and blinded assessors will be constantly supervised by one of the following endorsed neuropsychologists: Dr Rene Stolwyk (Senior lecturer and research supervisor within the School of Psychological Sciences at Monash University, since 2009. He has published over 45 journal articles in the field of neuropsychological rehabilitation), Dr Dana Wong (Senior lecturer of the School of Psychology & Public Health at La Trobe University, who has extensive experience in a variety of clinical settings since 2002) or Dr Adam McKay (Senior Clinical Neuropsychologist at Epworth Healthcare and Senior lecturer and research supervisor within the School of Psychological Sciences at Monash University). Mode of delivery: Both training techniques will be delivered face to face and individually. Time commitment: Four sessions of approximately two hours each. First session is to take baseline measures and to verify technical requirements of the participant’s smartphone. Second session (approximately one or two weeks after the first one) is when the training is provided. The last two sessions are one- and six- weeks follow-ups. Location: Sessions can be completed at the Monash Psychology Centre in Notting Hill, at the La Trobe Psychology Clinic in Bundoora, or at the participant’s home.

Sponsors

Monash University
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Educational / counselling / training
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Participant has had an acquired brain injury (e.g. stroke, traumatic brain injury, hypoxia, encephalitis, low grade tumour or in remission) 2. Participant > 18 years 3. Participant reports memory difficulties 4. Participant has a smartphone (iPhone or Android) 5. Participant is interested in learning a new app and improve usage of smartphone 6. Participant lives in Metropolitan Melbourne and is available for 4 sessions with trainer (Approx. 2 months) 7. Participant is fluent in English

Exclusion criteria

1. Significant dysphasia or low proficiency in English preventing intelligible responses and understanding of instructions 2. Severe neglect, vision or hearing difficulties precluding the person from seeing and listening to stimuli 3. Severe cognitive impairment preventing the understanding and completion of tasks 4. Motor or sensory difficulties impeding the person to manipulate a smartphone 5. Other significant neurological or psychiatric diagnoses that might impact performance 6. Having no access to a smartphone, which is the device targeted by the training

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026