Skip to content

Hospital costs of complications following liver resection surgery

Health economic impact of postoperative complications following liver resection surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12618001021268
Acronym
Not applicable
Enrollment
317
Registered
2018-06-19
Start date
2018-02-26
Completion date
2018-04-16
Last updated
2019-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Hepatic resection remains the standard of care for both malignant and benign tumours of the liver, despite numerous advances in tumour ablation, targeted radiation therapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy for liver cancers and related pathologies. As perioperative outcomes have improved over the last two decades, along with developments in the diagnosis and management of liver tumours, indications for hepatic resection have broadened. Accordingly, increasing knowledge of liver anatomy and physiology, alongside improving outcomes following hepatic resection, has fostered an increase in the complexity and extent of disease that is considered operable, with repeat and two-stage resections becoming increasingly more common. Increasing complexity and extent of hepatic resection carries an increase in the incidence and severity of postoperative complications, with typically more than 50% of patients experiencing complications even in high volume centres. Complications following liver resection not only carry a substantial clinical burden, they also place a growing economic burden upon healthcare providers. Complications present the greatest contribution to increased costs following hepatic resection, and consequently provide an important target for interventions seeking to reduce healthcare expenditure. As the demand for healthcare grows, utilising limited resources in an era of mounting costs is becoming paramount in maintaining an effective and universally available healthcare system. Despite this, there is limited health economic data available on the topic of hepatic resection, and even less so quantifying the cost of complications. Aiming to address this need, we aim to identify the relationship between the extent of liver resection, the incidence and severity of complications, and the ensuing costs. Additionally, we seek to examine the sources of cost differentials between complicated and uncomplicated patients. Secondary objectives aim to assess the impact of surgical technique on the incidence and severity of complications and associated costs. We also aim to identify patient and anaesthetic factors associated with the clinical and economic outcomes. We hypothesised that as more extensive hepatic resection was performed the incidence and severity of complications would increase, and accordingly an increase in costs would be associated.

Interventions

Elective or emergent liver resection, defined using the procedural ICD-10 codes: ‘30414-00: Excision of lesion of liver’, ‘30415-00: Segmental resection of liver’, ‘30418-00: Lobectomy of liver’, ‘30421-00: Trisegmental resection of liver’, ‘30427-00: Segmental resection of liver for trauma’, ‘30428-00: Lobectomy of liver for trauma’, and ‘30430-00: Trisegmental resection of live for trauma’. The procedures were performed at the Austin Hospital, a tertiary hospital with hepato-biliary expertise

Elective or emergent liver resection, defined using the procedural ICD-10 codes: ‘30414-00: Excision of lesion of liver’, ‘30415-00: Segmental resection of liver’, ‘30418-00: Lobectomy of liver’, ‘30421-00: Trisegmental resection of liver’, ‘30427-00: Segmental resection of liver for trauma’, ‘30428-00: Lobectomy of liver for trauma’, and ‘30430-00: Trisegmental resection of live for trauma’. The procedures were performed at the Austin Hospital, a tertiary hospital with hepato-biliary expertise, over the period of July 2010 and June 2017. Patients were followed-up for 30 days following discharge from the index admission. If no subsequent readmissions occurred within this period, follow-up ceased. If a patient was readmitted within the 30-day period, then the readmission was included, and following discharge from the readmission or end of the originial 30-day period, whichever was later, follow-up ceased.

Sponsors

Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health
Lead SponsorHospital

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- Patients undergoing hepatic resection at the Austin Hospital. - Included procedural ICD-10 codes were ‘30414-00: Excision of lesion of liver’, ‘30415-00: Segmental resection of liver’, ‘30418-00: Lobectomy of liver’, ‘30421-00: Trisegmental resection of liver’, ‘30427-00: Segmental resection of liver for trauma’, ‘30428-00: Lobectomy of liver for trauma’, and ‘30430-00: Trisegmental resection of live for trauma’ - elective and emergent cases

Exclusion criteria

Patients admitted more than one day prior to liver resection were excluded, to ensure cost data accurately reflected only operative and postoperative costs Patients undergoing liver resection that was minor and secondary to another concomitant major procedure were excluded.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026