Skip to content

Does video laryngoscopy administration ease the intubation in patients undergoing cesarean section ?

Comparison of the McGrath Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope on intubation times and glottic view assessment in Obstetric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12618000902291
Acronym
none
Enrollment
100
Registered
2018-05-29
Start date
2018-06-04
Completion date
2018-07-10
Last updated
2018-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

In difficult intubation cases, the guidelines provide recommendations for advanced airway equipment availability, and neuraxial anesthesia is encouraged. Our aim is to compare the McGrath video laryngoscope (VL) and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope (DL) according to the intubation time and glottic visualization in patients undergoing cesarean sections. Patients undergoing cesarean sections under general anesthesia will be included in this research. This study has a prospective design, and the patients will be randomized using a sealed envelope technique into 2 groups using either the Macintosh DL or the McGrath VL. During intubation, the times to obtaining a glottic view, tracheal tube placement, and confirming tracheal intubation as confirmed by CO2 waveform observation will be recorded. The mean arterial pressures and heart rates before intubation and after intubation will also be recorded. The mean tests will be compared using an independent t test if the data distribution are normal, or a nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test if the data are not distributed normally. A p value < 0.05 will be considered to be statistically significant.

Interventions

In this study we are using an airway approach for patients undergoing cesarean section under general anesthesia. After the patient arrive in the OR, the ASA standard monitoring procedures will be applied. All the patients will receive standard general anesthetic regimens, which include propofol [intravenous (IV), 1–2 mg/kg titrations] and rocuronium bromide (IV, 0.6 mg/kg). The timing measurements will begin once the McGrath video laryngoscope blade will be placed in 1 or 2 seconds in the patien

In this study we are using an airway approach for patients undergoing cesarean section under general anesthesia. After the patient arrive in the OR, the ASA standard monitoring procedures will be applied. All the patients will receive standard general anesthetic regimens, which include propofol [intravenous (IV), 1–2 mg/kg titrations] and rocuronium bromide (IV, 0.6 mg/kg). The timing measurements will begin once the McGrath video laryngoscope blade will be placed in 1 or 2 seconds in the patient’s mouth by the attending researcher anesthesiologist, and they will end when an end-tidal CO2 trace will be detected on the direct supervision by researcher. The attending anesthesiologist will rate the glottic visualization as the tracheal tube being inserted using the Cormack-Lehane classification system and the percentage of glottic opening (POGO)

Sponsors

Melike Korkmaz Toker
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Primary purpose
Treatment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients aged between 18-45 and with an ASA physical status I-II and undergoing cesarean section will be included to the study.

Exclusion criteria

The exclusion criteria will be as follows: the presence of cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, or neuromuscular diseases, restricted neck movements, retrognathia, an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of III or IV, a Mallampati score of IV, an airway-related surgery history, and emergency surgery.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026