None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
Hypothesis: We propose in patients with the dual phenotypes of severe allergic and eosinophilic asthma, that Mepolizumab is as effective as Omalizumab. However, we will also go on and identify key clinical biomarkers that will clarify which patients will respond best to each of these interventions. This study will be the first direct clinical comparison of these agents and will apply expert clinical characterization, along with cutting edge biotechnology to better inform treatment choices for severe asthma. This is an important and urgent management problem facing the Australian pharmaceutical scheme, where imprecision in prescribing will result in reduced clinical effectiveness as well as substantial and sustained costs.
Interventions
Treatment will be either mepolizumab 100mg subcutaneous injection monthly for 6 months or Omalizumab subcutaneous injection every 2-4 weeks (dosage determined by the Omalizumab nomogram). Administered by a nurse.
Sponsors
Peter Wark
Study design
Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
12 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Participants must have a duration of asthma of greater than one year. They must have confirmed asthma defined as: (i) forced expiratory volume (FEV1) reversibility greater than or equal to 12%, and greater than or equal to 200 mL at baseline within 30 minutes after administration of salbutamol (200 to 400 micrograms), or (ii) airway hyperresponsiveness defined as a greater than 20% decline in FEV1 during a direct bronchial provocation test or greater than 15% decline during an indirect bronchial provocation test, or (iii) peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability of greater than 15% between the two highest and two lowest peak expiratory flow rates during 14 days. They must have evidence of poor asthma control despite optimal ICS and long acting beta agonist (LABA), be treated by a respiratory physician or immunologist, and have demonstrated acceptable adherence and inhaler technique. Poor control is defined as: evidence of an FEV1 <80% of predicted in the last year on at least one occasion; treatment with OCS, either daily for at least 6 weeks, or a cumulative dose of OCS of at least 500 mg prednisolone equivalent in the previous 12 months, unless contraindicated or not tolerated. In addition they must demonstrate an: (a) an Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5)38 score of at least 2.0, as assessed in the previous month, and (b) while receiving optimised asthma therapy in the past 12 months, experienced at least 1 admission to hospital for a severe asthma exacerbation, or 1 severe asthma exacerbation, requiring documented use of OCS initiated or increased for at least 3 days, or parenteral corticosteroids prescribed/supervised by a physician. They must also demonstrate evidence of a dual allergic/ eosinophilic phenotype. This is defined as: a total serum IgE >30IU/mL, past or current evidence of atopy documented by skin prick testing or radioallergosorbent assay, and the participant must have a blood eosinophil count greater than or equal to 300 cells per microlitre in the last 6 weeks.
Exclusion criteria
Do not fulfil inclusion criteria Unable to attend appointments Significant psychiatric illness Unable to speak English
Outcome results
None listed