Hystroscopy versus laparoscopy use for tubal disconnection in cases of Fallopian tube dilatation before assisted reproduction .

Hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic tubal disconnection in infertile women with hydrosalpinges prior to IVF or ICSI to increase pregnancy rate

Status

Not yet recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

ANZCTR

Registry ID

ACTRN12618000760279

Enrollment

102

Registered

2018-05-07

Start date

2018-10-15

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Our hypothesis is that both hystroscopic or laparoscopic tubal disconnection of unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinges could prevent backflow of inflammatory fluid on endometrial cavity and though increased success rate of ICSI and IVF.we want to know which is better regarding study outcomes.

Interventions

Hysteroscopic unilateral or bilateral fallopian tube bipolar electrocoagulation by roller ball or insertion of Essure coil by gynaecology surgeon aiming to disconnect the diseased tube for women with fallopian tube dilatation as the only cause of infertility 1 month prior to assisted reproduction procedure as IVF or ICSI, to increase pregnancy rate.

Study design

Allocation

Randomised controlled trial

Intervention model

Parallel

Primary purpose

Treatment

Masking

Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 40 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

women with uni- or bilateral ultrasound visible hydrosalpinex confirmed by hystro-salpingography who are scheduled for an IVF/ICSI treatment ,BMI <35 kg/m2 ,All patients had regular menses ,Normal hormonal profile,Normal semen analyses of the husband

Exclusion criteria

Patients with other causes of infertility other than tubal factor ,Contraindication to laparoscopy or hystroscopy.

Outcome results