Skip to content

Daily variation in sleep apnea status and atrial fibrillation.

Night-to-night variability in severity of sleep apnea and daily dynamic atrial fibrillation risk.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12618000757213
Acronym
VARIOSA-AF
Enrollment
72
Registered
2018-05-04
Start date
2017-10-23
Completion date
2018-04-27
Last updated
2018-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is associated with increased incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, nightly SDB-severity rather than the categorical diagnosis of SDB may directly influence AF-risk during the respective day thereby creating a dynamic substrate for AF. While chronic structural alterations induced by SDB have been already described in AF patients with SDB, the role of night-to-night variability in SDB severity is unclear and clinical evidence for a dynamic AF substrate in patients related to nightly SDB severity is lacking. By simultaneous long-term night-by-night SDB and AF monitoring, we examine the dynamic intra-individual relationship between daily SDB-severity and risk of incident AF during the respective day.

Interventions

Observational Study: Daily data on atrial fibrillation burden and average respiratory disturbance index (RDI, sleep apnea status)) were extracted from a sample of Reply 200 or Kora 100 DR pacemakers in 72 patients with a mean follow-up per patient of 21±7 weeks. Nightly RDI within each patient was grouped into quartiles, with the highest quartile representing the 25% of nights with most severe SDB for that particular patient. A daily cumulative AF-burden of >5 mins, >1 hr and >12 hrs per day we

Observational Study: Daily data on atrial fibrillation burden and average respiratory disturbance index (RDI, sleep apnea status)) were extracted from a sample of Reply 200 or Kora 100 DR pacemakers in 72 patients with a mean follow-up per patient of 21±7 weeks. Nightly RDI within each patient was grouped into quartiles, with the highest quartile representing the 25% of nights with most severe SDB for that particular patient. A daily cumulative AF-burden of >5 mins, >1 hr and >12 hrs per day were the outcome variables.

Sponsors

Center for Heart Rhythm Disorders.
Lead SponsorOther Collaborative groups

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Implanted dual-chamber pacemakers Reply 200 or Kora 100 DR (LivaNova, France) with implemented SDB monitoring (SAM) measuring a respiratory disturbance index (RDI)

Exclusion criteria

- <1 month of follow-up since implant - SDB monitoring (SAM) turned off - >10% invalid RDI - unreliable mode switch estimates due to atrial under sensing - persistent AF throughout the recording

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026