Skip to content

ICECAP: Intermittent versus Continuous Energy Restriction Compared in an Athlete Population

Effect of Continuous Versus Intermittent Moderate Energy Restriction for Increased Fat Mass Loss and Fat Free Mass Retention in Adult Athletes

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12618000638235
Acronym
ICECAP
Enrollment
46
Registered
2018-04-23
Start date
2018-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Athletes commonly reduce body weight or body fat prior to contest seeking various competitive advantages. Intermittent energy restriction is known to effectively reduce body fat in non-athletes, however evidence in athletic populations is lacking. We thus aim to provide an evidence-based intermittent energy restriction protocol for athletes, by investigating this dietary model in a cohort of resistance trained athletes, using a macronutrient profile thought to maximise retention of fat free mass and performance during energy restriction. We will compare changes in fat mass, fat free mass and performance between a continuous and intermittent dieting approach. Measures of body composition, resting energy expenditure, hunger and satiety, blood hormone levels, and muscle strength and endurance will be taken at a number of time points throughout the study.

Interventions

This study will comprise of 3 phases: [1] Pre-energy restriction phase, [2] Energy restriction phase, and [3] Post-energy restriction phase. The Pre-energy restriction phase consists of training participants how to use a mobile application for self-monitoring energy and macronutrient intake during a diet log over 1 week. The diet log will be followed by a 4-week period of weight maintenance. Weight maintenance energy requirements will be estimated for each participant using a sequential series o

This study will comprise of 3 phases: [1] Pre-energy restriction phase, [2] Energy restriction phase, and [3] Post-energy restriction phase. The Pre-energy restriction phase consists of training participants how to use a mobile application for self-monitoring energy and macronutrient intake during a diet log over 1 week. The diet log will be followed by a 4-week period of weight maintenance. Weight maintenance energy requirements will be estimated for each participant using a sequential series of prediction equations that take into consideration age, sex, body size and physical activity level, as described previously (1). Participants will be instructed to contact the lead researcher (JP) if weight is gained or lost consecutively for 3 days, in which case they will be provided with an amended diet prescription to maintain weight stability. During the Energy restriction phase all participants will be randomised to continuous or intermittent energy restriction interventions. The continuous intervention consists of 12 weeks on a diet eliciting a weekly weight loss of 0.7% of the participant's Pre-energy restriction body weight in line with previous findings (2). The intermittent intervention consists of 12 weeks of total energy restriction administered as 3 weeks of energy restriction on the diet described above, followed by 1-week of energy balance on a diet at 100% of maintenance energy requirements, for a total of 15 weeks. Both interventions will be administered by the lead researcher (JP). If the participant achieves a weekly weight loss of < 0.5% of their Pre-energy restriction body weight, then the daily energy intake of the prescribed diet will be reduced by 5% to help keep participants at approximately the same rate of weight loss throughout the study, in keeping with a method commonly used by athletes to amend energy intake during weight loss interventions. Adherence to the allocated intervention will be evaluated via weekly review of participant food diaries and partially by success in reaching weekly weight loss targets. In the Post-energy restriction phase participants will complete a 6-month free-living period during which time there will not be any scheduled dietary support from the research team. The macronutrient prescription in energy restriction and energy balance will be based on previous nutritional recommendations for athletes undergoing weight loss interventions (3): protein intake of 2.3 g/kg of body weight, dietary fat intake of 20% of energy intake, with remaining energy intake allocated to carbohydrate to support training demands. (1) Gerrior S, Juan W, Peter B. An Easy Approach to Calculating Estimated Energy Requirements. . Preventing Chronic Disease. 2006;3(4). (2) Garthe I, Raastad T, Refsnes PE, Koivisto A, Sundgot-Borgen J. Effect of two different weight-loss rates on body composition and strength and power-related performance in elite athletes. International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism. 2011;21(2):97-104. (3) Helms ER, Aragon AA, Fitschen PJ. Evidence-based recommendations for natural bodybuilding contest preparation: nutrition and supplementation. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2014;11:20.

Sponsors

University of Western Australia
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Completed greater than or equal to 2 resistance exercise sessions per week for the previous 6 months or more Willing to comply with a dietary weight loss intervention for ~5 months, involving weight loss for ~3-4 months and weight stability for ~1-2 months

Exclusion criteria

Current smoker or gave up smoking within the last 6 months Pregnant or desiring to be pregnant within the next 10 months

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026