Skip to content

Polyvinyl chloride ring pessary versus silicon irregular hexagon pessary for pelvic organ prolapse: a randomised trial comparing treatment success

Polyvinyl chloride ring pessary versus silicon irregular hexagon pessary for pelvic organ prolapse: a randomised trial comparing treatment success.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12618000416291
Acronym
None
Enrollment
104
Registered
2018-03-21
Start date
2017-06-13
Completion date
2019-08-06
Last updated
2021-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The primary aim of this study is to compare the success rates of the new POP pessary compared to the conventional PVC ring pessary. Treatment success will be defined as retention of the pessary at 6 months follow-up. The secondary objectives are to evaluate subjects’ ability to perform self-care during pessary use, subjects’ satisfaction with pessary treatment and complications. Compared to surgery, vaginal pessaries have been the subjects of minimal scientific research. In particular, long-term vaginal pessary usage has been poorly studied.Whilst there are various shaped vaginal pessaries available it is standard clinical practice is to use a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) ring pessary that is usually changed or replaced every 6 months. With currently available pessaries, the overall retention rate of vaginal pessaries is low, due to discomfort, inconvenience, vaginal discharge or dislodgement. The failure rate (i.e. discontinuation with pessary usage) vary from 27% to 74%. The limited efficacy of currently available vaginal pessaries is well recognized. In our unit we have conducted two studies relevant to vaginal pessary use. They were the vaginal dimensions based on vaginal casts taken from 60 women with pelvic organ prolapse and also biofilm formation on vaginal pessaries after 6 months of use. In order to reduce discharge associated with pessary use patients can be instructed in ‘self-care’ of their pessary by learning how to remove, clean and replace their pessary. However, some women find if difficult to remove and replace traditional PVC ring pessaries. Based on the results of these studies, we have developed a more anatomically shaped pessary. The additional ‘fold points’ in the rim of the pessary and a loop at the caudal end of the new pessary were incorporated into the design to enhance patients’ self-care during pessary use. The ‘fold points’ in the new pessary will make it more flexible (relative to the PVC pessary) during removal and replacement. A loop attached to the caudal aspect of the new pessary will facilitate removal of the pessary by the patient. With the above features, we have hypothesized that the new POP pessary will be at least 30% more successful than the conventional PVC ring pessary.

Interventions

Silicon irregular hexagonal pessary is a non surgical device used for conservative management of pelvic organ prolapse. Participants meeting the study inclusion criteria will be given the information and consent form. The randomisation process takes place once the subject agreed to participate in the study. The allocation will be concealed in an envelope to prevent selection bias. Once the participants been allocated to particular treatment group, the initial pessary pessary fitting by undertake

Silicon irregular hexagonal pessary is a non surgical device used for conservative management of pelvic organ prolapse. Participants meeting the study inclusion criteria will be given the information and consent form. The randomisation process takes place once the subject agreed to participate in the study. The allocation will be concealed in an envelope to prevent selection bias. Once the participants been allocated to particular treatment group, the initial pessary pessary fitting by undertaken by doctors and subsequent appointments for pessary change will be undertaken by nurse specialists at pessary clinic. All participants are required to complete the following questionnaires on the first visit before the pessary fitting. They are: (i) Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaires (PFDI-20) to assess the severity of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and impact on bowel and bladder function; (ii) Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaires (PISQ-12) to measure sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders; and (iii) Euro Qol Health Questionnaires (EQ-5D) to assess current health status. These are the recommended questionnaires by the international pelvic floor society, International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI) that have been validated to assess quality of life in women with pelvic floor disorders. After completing the questionnaires, subjects will be fitted with a vaginal pessary. The pessary size will be determined on a ‘best-fit’ basis by the clinician fitting the pessary. Topical vaginal oestrogen therapy (Ovestin 1mg/g or Vagifem 10mcg twice weekly) will be prescribed based on clinician preference from the first visit for post-menopausal subjects unless it is contraindicated such as history of breast cancer. Subjects are recommended to use the vaginal oestrogen therapy as long as the pessary is in place. The continuous daily pessary use and the use of vaginal oestrogen therapy will not be monitored as part of the study. Subjects will be reviewed at 1 week to assess correct pessary size and the nurse specialist will instruct subjects to perform self-care of the pessary. This will include teaching the subjects methods to remove, clean and replace their pessary once a week. Subjects who are unable to comply with the recommended self-care advice will be considered as failure in self-care. However, patients continuing to use pessary for 6 months will still be considered as a treatment success whether or not they are able to achieve self-care. For subjects continuing pessary use, further reviews will be undertaken at 6 and 12 months. At these visits, the existing pessaries will be replaced with the same type of pessary that was used. Any adverse events such as vaginal bleeding, discharge, or odour that might indicate vaginal infection and ulceration that is reported by subjects will be recorded at each follow up visits. Subjects with symptomatic vaginal ulceration will have the pessary left out and will be reviewed after 2 weeks to ensure resolution of the problem before replacing the pessary. Subjects with suspected vaginal infection will have a vaginal swab taken and given an antibiotic prescription for treatment. Subjects will be to self report to the clinic if they have any issues in between visits or if the pessary is expelled at any stage. We have appointed Dr Oliver Daly (Urogynaecologist) to be in Data and Safety Monitoring Committee for this study. However, any serious adverse events will be reported to the Royal Women’s Hospital Ethics Committee and Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).

Sponsors

The Royal Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

At least 18 years old with symptomatic POP Able to speak and read English Not previously used a vaginal pessary for POP At least stage II POP from any single compartment or a multi-compartment POP Willing to use ring pessary Willing and able to complete quality of life (QoL) questionnaires and attend follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

Refusal to participate in the study Unable to speak or read English Women less than 18 years old Previous vaginal pessary use Prior prolapse surgery Contraindicated to topical oestrogen therapy e.g. previous or current history of breast cancer Unwilling to use a vaginal pessary Unwilling and unable to complete QoL questionnaires and attend follow-up visits

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026