Skip to content

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling among un- and under-screened Maori, Pacific and Asian women: a randomised controlled community trial to examine the effect of self-sampling on participation in cervical-cancer screening

Comparison of two invitation-based methods for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling with standard recall for usual care among un- and under-screened Maori, Pacific and Asian women: a randomised controlled community trial to examine the effect of self-sampling on participation in cervical-cancer screening

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12618000367246
Enrollment
5546
Registered
2018-03-12
Start date
2018-06-08
Completion date
2020-05-13
Last updated
2021-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

There are major ethnic inequalities in cervical cancer screening, incidence, and mortality in New Zealand. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main cause of cervical cancer. Screening for oncogenic HPV genotypes (with appropriate subsequent treatment) could prevent nearly all cervical cancers. We hypothesize that offering the opportunity for self-sampling to obtain a cervical specimen for HPV testing will increase participation rates in the National Cervical Screening Programme and will thus decrease incidence of, and mortality from, cervical cancer. We will conduct a community trial in Maori, Pacific and Asian women, comparing invitation for cytology with invitation for self-sampling. We will determine whether un- and under-screened women find self-sampling acceptable and establish which factors affect their perceptions. The study aims to contribute to decreasing inequalities in New Zealand by exploring the use of a new cervical screening method that women who do not currently undergo screening may find acceptable.

Interventions

Assessing uptake and acceptability of a new human papilloma virus (HPV) detection method (low vaginal self-sampling with cotton swab and HPV molecular testing with the Roche cobas 4800 platform) in comparison to (minimally altered) usual care, for primary cervical-cancer screening. Invitation through the primary care clinic (monthly matched lists between primary care enrolled patient and cervical screening register is routine practice, these lists will be used for identifying eligible women). Wo

Assessing uptake and acceptability of a new human papilloma virus (HPV) detection method (low vaginal self-sampling with cotton swab and HPV molecular testing with the Roche cobas 4800 platform) in comparison to (minimally altered) usual care, for primary cervical-cancer screening. Invitation through the primary care clinic (monthly matched lists between primary care enrolled patient and cervical screening register is routine practice, these lists will be used for identifying eligible women). Women will be randomised to one of three arms: clinic-based self-sampling (clinic-based SS), mail-out self-sampling (mail-out SS) or usual care. Clinic-based SS women will be invited to attend the clinic, discuss the study, consent, and complete a questionnaire. Clinic-based SS women able to complete the self-sampling at the clinic (in the bathroom) during this visit or, to ensure clinical safety, they will be able to take the kit home and return it to the clinic, but this will be recorded and analysed separately. Mail-out SS women will be posted a kit (to their home) and asked to complete the consent & laboratory forms, take the sample, complete the questionnaire, and arrange (free) courier pick-up of the completed kit, or to take the completed kit to a community laboratory. Uptake of the invitation to participate will be monitored via receipt of test results into the study IT system and, for the clinic-based SS group, via clinic attendance record. Four weeks after the invitation letters have been sent, all non-responding women will be sent a reminder text message. The reminder text message for the mail-out SS group will include a telephone number that the woman can use to request that a second sampling kit be sent. Contact details for research nurses are included in the invitation letters. The research nurses will answer any questions that the women have over the telephone. All results will be provided to women, even if it is usual practice for the clinic not to return negative results. Positive results women will be phoned and asked to attend the clinic to discuss with the GP, practice nurse or research nurse. All screening (including usual care) will be provided free of charge (most women have to pay for cervical screening; secondary care is free of charge in NZ). The study is assessing the impact of this intervention, and the two different invitation methods, on participation rates for cervical screening among un- and under-screened women.

Sponsors

Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
30 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Age 30-69 Never-screened or under-screened (at least 5 years from previous test) Maori, Pacific or Asian ethnicity Resident in Waitemata District Health Board (DHB), Auckland DHB or Capital & Coast DHB Enrolled in an Auckland or Wellington general practice

Exclusion criteria

Exclusions as per New Zealand National Cervical Screening Programme Guidelines, including women: 1. who have had a benign total hysterectomy 2. who have previously or currently have cervical cancer 3. who are symptomatic (abnormal bleeding, pelvic pain, or symptoms of a sexually transmitted infection). In addition, women: 1. who have previously had a high-grade lesion and have not attended for colposcopy (remaining at high clinical risk) 2. who are currently pregnant.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026