Skip to content

The impact of an antimicrobial stewardship team on the appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy in sepsis

The impact of an antimicrobial stewardship team on the appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy in sepsis

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12618000116224
Enrollment
120
Registered
2018-01-29
Start date
2018-01-29
Completion date
2018-08-15
Last updated
2018-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Background: Sepsis is one of the leading causes of death in hospital patients. The early administration of broad spectrum antimicrobials improves survival in sepsis. However, the use of these antimicrobials must be balanced with their unintended consequences, such as the development of antimicrobial resistance and adverse effects. Many patients receive prolonged courses of inappropriate antimicrobials in suspected sepsis. The established antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) team currently do a post-­prescription review of restricted antimicrobials and positive blood cultures. They do not routinely review treatment in sepsis, however they may have a role to promote the optimal use of antimicrobials in this setting. Aim: To determine the impact of AMS intervention in patients with medical emergency team (MET) calls for suspected sepsis Hypothesis: AMS intervention will improve appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy in suspected sepsis Participants: Patients with MET calls for suspected sepsis Method: Randomised controlled trial Control: Standard care (antimicrobials managed by the home team) Intervention: Standard care PLUS AMS review 48 hours post MET call Outcomes: Appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy at 72 hours post MET call

Interventions

In hospital patients with medical emergency team (MET) calls for suspected sepsis, antimicrobial therapy is currently managed by the admitting, or home, team. Complex cases may be referred to specialist Infectious Diseases (ID) clinicians on request by the treating team. The antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) team (ID physician and pharmacist) currently conduct a post prescription review of a limited patient group, after the prescription of restricted antimicrobial agents or a positive blood cultur

In hospital patients with medical emergency team (MET) calls for suspected sepsis, antimicrobial therapy is currently managed by the admitting, or home, team. Complex cases may be referred to specialist Infectious Diseases (ID) clinicians on request by the treating team. The antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) team (ID physician and pharmacist) currently conduct a post prescription review of a limited patient group, after the prescription of restricted antimicrobial agents or a positive blood culture result. The former group is primarily identified by clinical pharmacists who request review of their patients, but the AMS team also reviews patients on broad spectrum antimicrobial agents identified by other means. This AMS review is a focused review of medical records, pathology results and clinical notes, but does not include a clinical or physical review of the patient. The AMS team then make recommendations about antimicrobial therapy to the treating team. Currently, patients with MET calls for suspected sepsis are not routinely seen by the AMS team, despite the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. Many of these patients are not flagged to the AMS team via the current practice, or referral via current notification mechanisms is often delayed. The intervention will be ongoing standard care as above, as well as an expert ID AMS review at 48 hours after a MET call for suspected sepsis.

Sponsors

Alfred Hospital Pharmacy Department
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-Patients with MET calls for suspected sepsis, as identified by Riskman® reports (hospital risk management system) -First MET call only during the study period

Exclusion criteria

-Patients under the care of an ID physician -Patients who have already been seen by AMS post MET call, or will be seen on the day of randomisation as standard care (i.e. patients with electronic alerts for restricted antimicrobials or positive blood cultures) -Patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) within 48 hours post MET call -Patients with a limitation of care order prohibiting active treatment of sepsis

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026