Skip to content

The Australasian Paediatric Head Injury Rules Study: Assessing the gap prior to implementation (APHIRST Gap). A mixed methods study examining the use of CT scanning of the brain in the management of children admitted to the Emergency Department with a head injury.

The Australasian Paediatric Head Injury Rules Study: Assessing the gap prior to implementation (APHIRST Gap). A mixed methods study examining the use, and the related factors influencing the use, of CT scanning of the brain (CTB) in the management of children admitted to Emergency Departments with mild head injury and using this information to inform a knowledge translation strategy.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12617001591347
Acronym
APHIRST Gap (Australasian Paediatric Head Injury Rules Study: Assessing the gap prior to implementat
Enrollment
3172
Registered
2017-12-01
Start date
2017-04-01
Completion date
2018-12-11
Last updated
2019-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

This study is a multi-centre, mixed method, retrospective, observational study in children aged 0 to 16 years presenting to an Emergency department with head injuries of any severity. We are assessing the use of CT scanning of the brain in the diagnosis of head injury and exploring the clinician and organisational related factors influencing the use of CT scanning by conducting interviews with clinical staff employed in Emergency departments.

Interventions

This study utilises a mixed method study design. Quantitative study: Sites will conduct a retrospective medical record audit of children admitted to their Emergency Department (ED) between January 1 and December 31, 2016 with a presenting diagnosis of head injury. Data from the first 100 eligible patients will be collected on the use of CT scanning of the brain (CTB) to confirm their diagnosis at discharge, with the objective of identifying hospital and or patient level factors associated wit

This study utilises a mixed method study design. Quantitative study: Sites will conduct a retrospective medical record audit of children admitted to their Emergency Department (ED) between January 1 and December 31, 2016 with a presenting diagnosis of head injury. Data from the first 100 eligible patients will be collected on the use of CT scanning of the brain (CTB) to confirm their diagnosis at discharge, with the objective of identifying hospital and or patient level factors associated with CTB use. We are specifically looking at the variation of CTB use between tertiary, urban and rural/regional hospitals located in Australia and New Zealand. Each site will conduct a medical record search for admissions to their ED with a diagnosis of head injury. Each record will be screened for eligibility, with data collected from the first 100 eligible records only. Data will be directly entered into a secure web-based database. Qualitative study: Interviews will be conducted with clinical staff at participating EDs with various levels of training and expertise to identify and explore the clinician and organisational related factors influencing the use of CTB in children with mild head injuries, We are interested in identifying the resources available and used by clinicians in EDs to inform their management of mild head injuries. Potential participants will be provided with an Information Statement and participation in the interview will be considered as implied consent. Interviews will be recorded, transcribed and qualitatively analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).

Sponsors

Professor Franz Babl
Lead SponsorIndividual

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
0 to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Quantitative study: - Any child aged from birth to their 16th birthday - Presented to the Emergency Department in 2016 - Diagnosis of Head Injury Qualitative study: - Doctor (including trainees) or Registered Nurse - Working in a clinical role (part-time or full-time) - Working in an Australian or New Zealand Emergency Department

Exclusion criteria

Quantitative study: - Patients presenting to the ED more than 24 hours after a blunt head trauma - Patients who have had neuroimaging performed at another hospital prior to presenting - Patients re-presenting within 24 hours of a CTB at the ED with isolated dental injury as a primary diagnosis Qualitative study: - Students and interns - Clinicians not engaged in clinical practice - Agency or bank staff (nurses) or locums (medical)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026