Skip to content

The effectiveness of cervical mobilization on decreasing pain, increasing shoulder strength and function in patients with non-specific shoulder/arm pain

Effectiveness of cervical mobilization versus conventional physical therapy on pain intensity, shoulder strength, function, and disability in patients with non-specific shoulder/arm pain

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12617001556336
Enrollment
0
Registered
2017-11-15
Start date
2017-11-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Purpose: the aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness among the cervical antero-posterior gapping mobilization plus lateral glide mobilization, the cervical antero-posterior gapping mobilization alone, and the sham cervical manual therapy on decreasing pain, increasing neck/shoulder mobility, improving function in patients with non-specific shoulder/arm pain. Hypothesis: the antero-posterior mobilization and lateral glide mobilization group and the antero-posterior mobilization groups would be more effective than the control group (sham manual therapy) on decreasing pain, increasing neck/shoulder mobility, improving function in patients with non-specific shoulder/arm pain.

Interventions

The intervention group 1 (anterior to posterior gapping and lateral glide cervical mobilization): Subjects in this group will receive cervical mobilization treatments including (1) anterior–posterior gapping of the facet joints, performed in supine for 30 repetitions for 3 sets; and (2) lateral to medial gliding movements of each cervical segment from C3 to C6, performed in supine for 30 repetitions for 3 sets. The intervention will be given by a physiotherapist. The intervention group 2 (anter

The intervention group 1 (anterior to posterior gapping and lateral glide cervical mobilization): Subjects in this group will receive cervical mobilization treatments including (1) anterior–posterior gapping of the facet joints, performed in supine for 30 repetitions for 3 sets; and (2) lateral to medial gliding movements of each cervical segment from C3 to C6, performed in supine for 30 repetitions for 3 sets. The intervention will be given by a physiotherapist. The intervention group 2 (anterior to posterior gapping mobilization): Subjects in this group will receive cervical mobilization treatments including the anterior–posterior gapping of the facet joints, performed in supine for 30 repetitions for 3 sets. The intervention will be given by a physiotherapist. The above two intervention groups will also receive modality intervention after mobilization. The modality intervention include the application of hot pack for 10 mins, ultrasound and/or interferential current therapy (frequency: 50-160Hz, 4bps; Intensity: 10-50mA) for 15 mins. The approximate duration of each treatment session for each group will be 45 minutes. The whole treatment program for the two intervention groups will be 6 sessions (2 sessions per week for 3 weeks). The intervention adherence will be recorded using a log sheet by the study therapist. Subjects will be reminded to adhere their treatment schedule during each session.

Sponsors

National Yang-Ming University
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with non-specific shoulder/arm pain aged more than 20 years 2. Pain/symptoms or weakness with shoulder resisted strength testing (shoulder flexors and abductors)

Exclusion criteria

1. Shoulder tendinitis (palpable tenderness on the rotator cuff tendons or the biceps tendon) 2. Previous surgery of the neck or shoulder 3. Previous dislocation of the affected shoulder 3. Clinically definitive arthritis of the shoulder on X-ray 4. Had a cortisone injection for the current episode of shoulder pain 5. Had any neurological diseases

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026