Skip to content

A gerontology nurse specialist role for high risk older people in the community

The effect of a primary care gerontology nurse specialist role for high risk older people on healthcare utilisation: a quasi-experimental study.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12617001332314
Enrollment
1400
Registered
2017-09-18
Start date
2010-10-01
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2017-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Background: Nurse-led models of comprehensive geriatric assessment and ongoing care coordination can improve health management as well as reduce hospitalisations for high risk community dwelling older people. This study investigated the effect on healthcare utilisation of systematic case finding to identify high risk older people in the community with a subsequent comprehensive assessment and care coordination intervention by a Gerontology Nurse Specialist based in primary care. This was a quasi-experimental, one year pre-post design located within primary healthcare practices in Auckland, New Zealand. An intervention model was initiated within two primary healthcare practices and involved a screening tool to identify high risk older people with succeeding gerontology nurse specialist assessment and care coordination. The comparison group included older people who received usual care at three comparable primary healthcare practices. The primary outcome measure was acute hospital admissions. Secondary outcomes included hospital re-admissions, length of stay, emergency department presentations, residential care admissions, and community contacts.

Interventions

The study was a quasi-experimental design. An innovative intervention model was instigated within the primary healthcare setting comprising a screening tool to identify high risk older people with succeeding Gerontology Nurse Specialist (GNS) assessment and care coordination. The intervention model of care was initiated in two urban primary healthcare practices. Older adults aged 75 years or greater and enrolled in one of the primary healthcare practices were eligible for participation in the st

The study was a quasi-experimental design. An innovative intervention model was instigated within the primary healthcare setting comprising a screening tool to identify high risk older people with succeeding Gerontology Nurse Specialist (GNS) assessment and care coordination. The intervention model of care was initiated in two urban primary healthcare practices. Older adults aged 75 years or greater and enrolled in one of the primary healthcare practices were eligible for participation in the study. Older adults were excluded if they were residing in a residential care facility at the start of the study or if at the time they were receiving care under the local hospital-based GNS team. The Brief Risk Identification for Geriatric Health Tool (BRIGHT) was used to case find high risk older people. This screening tool is a straightforward 11 item self-administered survey. Each of the 11 questions has a “yes” or “no” answer and represents one count. The scores are summed with a total of three or higher indicating high risk of health and/or functional decline. The BRIGHT screen was posted, with a return self-addressed paid envelope, to older people who met eligibility criteria in the intervention group. If the posted BRIGHT screen was not completed and returned within two weeks, the GNS was to undertake follow-up phone calls to administer the BRIGHT over the phone. Subsequently, within one month of receiving the returned BRIGHT all older people deemed high risk (BRIGHT score of 3 or greater) were visited by the GNS in their own home where a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) was undertaken. This assessment would take approximately 1-1.5hrs. General Practitioners (GPs) could also directly refer older people they were concerned about to the GNS for assessment. The CGA was to be undertaken within two weeks of the returned BRIGHT screen, in the older person’s home at a mutually convenient time. A mixture of specific questions and standardised assessment tools were used to holistically and comprehensively assess the domains of physical health, functional ability, cognitive impairment, depression, pain, medications and social issues. Following this assessment, the GNS provided a summary of the older person’s current issues and developed an individualised intervention plan, this varied depending on personalised need, although often included education, referrals and ongoing GNS input and follow up. This summary was sent to the GP. The GNS was located within the primary healthcare organisation as well as integrating with hospital based specialist gerontology teams. These specialist teams provided the GNS with mentorship and increased expertise through peer clinical education sessions and weekly case conferences. The combination of primary and secondary care engagement afforded the GNS access to primary healthcare practice and hospital patient databases as well as the ability to simultaneously coordinate with community and specialist hospital services.

Sponsors

Anna King
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
75 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Older adults aged 75 years or greater and enrolled in one of the primary healthcare practices were eligible for participation in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Older adults were excluded if they were residing in a residential care facility at the start of the study or if at the time they were receiving care under the local hospital-based GNS team.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026