Skip to content

Shockwave therapy and ultrasound therapy for chronic Achilles tendinopathy

Objective and subjective assessment of the efficacy of radial shock wave therapy and sonotherapy in Achilles tendinopathy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12617000860369
Enrollment
39
Registered
2017-06-09
Start date
2017-10-11
Completion date
2022-03-07
Last updated
2022-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Tendinopathies are among the most common musculoskeletal system disorders, mainly in the population of manual workers and athletes. Achilles tendinopathy hampers engagement in intense physical activity and causes patients to seek effective treatment. Physical therapy is a valuable component of a complex intervention program facilitating the achievement of the desired outcomes. The main objective of the study is to determine and compare the efficacy of radial shock wave therapy and sonotherapy for Achilles tendinopathy. Candidates qualified for the study will be randomly allocated to one of three experimental groups: Group A will receive radial shock wave therapy, Group B ultrasound therapy and Group C placebo ultrasound. Posturographic measurements, countermovement jump quantification, forward body lean and subjective assessment will be taken prior to therapy and at 1, 6, and 24 weeks of therapy completion.

Interventions

The main aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of radial shock wave and ultrasound therapies for Achilles tendinopathy. Patients diagnosed with Achilles tendinopathy will be randomly allocated to one of three experimental groups: Group A: radial shock wave therapy Group B: ultrasound therapy Group C: placebo ultrasound Group A - radial shock waves will be applied without local aesthesia using ShockMaster 500 (Gymna-Uniphy) with a pneumatic applicator. A gel will be applied on the patient’s

The main aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of radial shock wave and ultrasound therapies for Achilles tendinopathy. Patients diagnosed with Achilles tendinopathy will be randomly allocated to one of three experimental groups: Group A: radial shock wave therapy Group B: ultrasound therapy Group C: placebo ultrasound Group A - radial shock waves will be applied without local aesthesia using ShockMaster 500 (Gymna-Uniphy) with a pneumatic applicator. A gel will be applied on the patient’s skin in the target area to help conduct the shock waves. The patient will be positioned prone with a roll under ankles and foot dorsiflexion. Applicator: standard 15 mm applicator, D-Actor vibration applicator. Pressure: 2.5 – 4.0 bars. Number of shocks: 2000-6000. Frequency: 4 – 15 Hz. Number of therapy sessions: 3 (duration of intersession break 4-10 days). Duration of each session: approximately 7-10 minutes Group B - sonotherapy will be performed with a device for ultrasound applications – Pulson 400(Gymna). The skin will be coated with a coupling agent, ie., ultrasound gel. The patient will be positioned prone with a roll under the ankles. Tranducer head size: 4 cm^2. Ultrasound frequency: 3 MHz. Ultrasound power density (spatial average of the density): 0.1 – 1.5 W/cm^2. Pulse ratio (duty cycle): 25 – 100 %. The duration of a therapy session will depend on the size of the treatment area – each square centimeter will be exposed to ultrasonic energy for 1 to 2.5 minutes. Frequency of therapy sessions: everyday, five days a week (except for Saturday and Sunday). Number of therapy sessions: 10. Duration of each session: approximately 7-10 minutes The parameters of the treatment in Group A and in Group B were determined based on our own clinical experience and reasoning, literature review (Val Robertson et al.: Electrotherapy Explained, Principles and Practice, 4th Edition, Elsevier; Król Piotr & Franek Andrzej: Fala uderzeniowa w leczeniu dysfunkcji ukladu narzadów ruchu, Meden 2014) and general principles of application of physical modalities. Group C– quasi sonotherapy will be performed with Pulson 400 (Gymna). The skin will be coated with a coupling agent, ie., ultrasound gel. The patient will be positioned prone with a roll under ankles. All ultrasound device parameters and therapy procedures will be identical as in Group B except that the transducerwill not generate sound waves. The number of therapy sessions will be 10. During the first two weeks of the therapy, all study groups will also undergo deep friction massage. The following measurements will be performed to objectively assess therapy effects: I. Stabilography will be carried out using 2 AMTI AccuSway platforms with integrated sensors to register ground reaction forces and the horizontal torque applied by the subject’s feet. A two-platform test (Platforms A and B) will consist of 7 trials: a/ Quiet standing with one foot resting on Platform A and the other on Platform B situated next to Platform A. Two 60-second trials in a quiet standing position will be recorded for each of the two testing conditions: eyes open and eyes closed. b/ Two lean-forward trials to the limits of stability (LOS) with movement at the ankles only. The protocol of LOS will consist of three phases: Phase 1 – 10s of quiet standing (quiet standing with one foot resting on Platform A and the other on Platform B situated next to Platform A); Phase 2 – the maximal forward-lean in a self-paced manner; Phase 3 – maintenance of the maximal forward-lean. c/ Two lean-backward trials to the limits of stability (LOS) with movement at the ankles only. The protocol of LOS will consist of three phases: Phase 1 – 10s of quiet standing (quiet standing with one foot resting on Platform A and the other on Platform B situated next to Platform A); Phase 2 – the maximal backward-lean in a self-paced manner; Phase 3 – maintenance of the maximal backward-lean. The step initiation's tests: d/ Three repetitions: quiet standing on platform A for 15 seconds, then changing to Platform B (1 step) followed by quiet standing for another 15 seconds. The distance between platforms: 10cm. e/ Three repetitions:quiet standing on Platform A for 15 seconds, then changing to Platform B (1 step) followed by quiet standing for another 15 seconds. A 15-cm obstacle over the edge of the platforms; the distance between platforms: 10 cm. f/ Three repetitions – quiet standing on Platform A for 15 seconds, then changing to Platform B (1 step up) followed by quiet standing for another 15 seconds. Platform B is placed on a 17-cm base directly at the edge of Platform A. g/ Three repetitions – quiet standing on Platform B for 15 seconds, then changing to Platform A (1 step down) followed by quiet standing for another 15 seconds. Platform B is placed on a 17-cm base directly at the edge of Platform A. The step initiation's tests: The recording of COP displacements will be divided into three phases: Phase 1 – quiet standing before step initiation Phase 2 – transit Phase 3 – quiet standing until measurement completion. The recording will be divided into phases using an algorithm whose main elements will be foot contact with the platform and the limit of momentary COP displacement; beyond that point exit from stability or stability gain will be observed. Stability is defined as body sway where momentary COP displacement does not exceed average COP displacement plus three standard deviations. For Phase 1, average COP and SD will be calculated based on measurements made within the first 5 sec of the test. For Phase 3 – based on the last 5 sec of the test. Platform changing will each time start at a sound signal. The procedure of step initiation will be performed twice to make sure that each trial is initiated using alternate limbs. II. Vertical jump (without an arm swing) measurements will be taken on an AMTI AccuSway platform. The following trials will be performed: - countermovement jump (starting position: quiet standing) , - squat jump (starting position: knees flexed to 90°). In each of the above trials the patients will perform three maximal jumps and three sub-maximal jumps (approximately 50% of the maximum height). - muscle stiffness test: five maximal countermovement jumps in a row without an arm-swing, with a minimum bend at lower limb joints. Posturographic measurements, countermovement jump quantification, forward body lean and subjective assessment will be taken prior to therapy and at 1, 6, and 24 weeks of therapy completion.

Sponsors

The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

- symptoms of pain of the Achilles tendon over 3 months duration - tendon abnormalities identified on ultrasound

Exclusion criteria

- candidates under 18 years of age - pregnancy - thrombophlebitis - atherosclerosis - renal failure - local lower limb infection - neoplastic disease - history of Achilles tendon surgery - knee instability - ankle instability - lower extremity length discrepancy - lower extremity cellulitis - anticoagulant therapy - physical therapy during 6 weeks preceding the study - corticosteroid injections during 6 weeks preceding the study - type 1 diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus with insulin therapy - rheumatoid arthritis and other rheumatoid disease - cardiac pacemaker - cardiac arrhythmia - cardiovascular insufficiency - patellar tendinitis - bilateral Achilles tendinopathy - history of stroke (ischemic, hemorrhagic)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026