Skip to content

Combination therapy with mandibular advancement splint and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for sub-optimally treated obstructive sleep apnoea

Can mandibular advancement improve CPAP effectiveness in patients sub-optimally treated with CPAP using an oronasal mask?

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12617000645358
Acronym
Nil
Enrollment
16
Registered
2017-05-04
Start date
2017-05-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is common and an important contributor to cardiovascular disease, stroke, and depression. The first line treatment for OSA is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) which is highly effective in treating OSA. However, up to 50% of patients are unable or unwilling to tolerate CPAP. Nasal masks are most frequently used, however oronasal masks covering the nose and mouth, may be chosen due to patient preference, nasal obstruction or air leak through the mouth. There is growing evidence suggesting that oronasal masks are less effective in controlling OSA. Patients using oronasal masks are a clinically difficult group of patients to treat, often requiring higher CPAP pressures, with significant mask leaks, a higher residual AHI and lower adherence to treatment. Mandibular Advancement Devices (MAD) are emerging as an alternative treatment particularly in patients with mild to moderate OSA, CPAP intolerant OSA and primary snorers. The O2Vent T is a custom-made MAD with an enclosed airway that allows airflow through the device. Like all MADs, the lower jaw is brought forward to stabilize the upper airway, however unlike other devices, patients can also breathe through the device while the jaw position stabilized. This may be of benefit to those with nasal obstruction and a tendency to mouth breathe i.e. patients using oronasal masks. Our aim is to assess whether treatment effectiveness can be improved with combination CPAP and MAD, in a group of patients with OSA who are sub-optimally treated with CPAP using an oronasal mask. Treatment effectiveness is a clinical decision based on factors including compliance, residual Apnoea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), pressure requirements and leak. We hypothesize that compared to CPAP with oronasal mask, combination therapy will result in: a) Lower pressure requirements b) Lower AHI c) Lower leak d) Better compliance Participants will be monitored for CPAP efficacy and compliance using their oronasal mask for 4 weeks using an auto-titrating CPAP (APAP). They will be fitted with a customized MAD (O2Vent T) and then use this in combination with their APAP (combination therapy) for a further 4 week period. Further advancement of the MAD may need to occur if clinically indicated (ie for a period of 4 to 12 weeks maximum). Treatment effectiveness between the groups will be compared using downloaded data from the participants APAP machines. This will include AHI, pressure requirements, usage and leak, which will all be downloaded from the participants APAP machines at the end of the relevant treatment periods.

Interventions

Participants will use CPAP in autoset mode (APAP) during sleep on all nights for a period of 4 weeks (own control group). During this period, APAP will be administered via the participants usual oronasal mask (ie full face mask) with a pressure range of 5-20cm of water. Participants with be then fitted with an O2Vent T Mandibular Advancement Device via a trained prosthodontist Dr Chris Hart. The O2Vent T is a customized duo-block titratable oral appliance that is registered with the Therapeuti

Participants will use CPAP in autoset mode (APAP) during sleep on all nights for a period of 4 weeks (own control group). During this period, APAP will be administered via the participants usual oronasal mask (ie full face mask) with a pressure range of 5-20cm of water. Participants with be then fitted with an O2Vent T Mandibular Advancement Device via a trained prosthodontist Dr Chris Hart. The O2Vent T is a customized duo-block titratable oral appliance that is registered with the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) as a Class I therapeutic product. Fitting and further advancement of the device will occur over 1 to 3 sessions total depending on the individual participants response and overall positioning of the device. Participants will use the O2Vent T Mandibular Advancement Splint in combination with their APAP for a 4-12 week period depending on the necessary number of advancements made (ie 0 advancements = 4 weeks; 1 advancements = 8 weeks; 2 advancements = 12 weeks). The decision for further advancement will depend on the dental reviews mentioned above. Data will be gathered for each treatment period (ie 4 week control group and 4-12 week treatment group). For the 4-12 weak treatment period, the data gathered will be obtained across each separate 4 week period (within the 4-12 weeks) pending the number of advancements made during dental reviews. Data attained will include daily and total usage, required APAP pressures, AHI and leak. All of this complete data will be accessible and attained via the participants APAP machine downloads for all treatment periods described. There is deemed to be no significant washout period in between the two treatments, however, if this does occur, patients will simply continue on their usual CPAP for that time. This will not impact on the study results.

Sponsors

Sleep Care - Greenslopes Private Hospital
Lead SponsorHospital

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomised trial
Intervention model
Crossover
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants will be selected based on the following inclusion criteria: 1. Obstructive sleep apnoea as diagnosed by polysomnography with AHI>5 2. Current treatment with CPAP using an oronasal mask deemed as suboptimal 3. Assessed as dentally suitable for oral appliance 4. Able to provide written informed consent to all study procedures, investigators to access clinical records from treating physician and agrees to adhere to all protocol requirements 5. Geographically suitable

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant or lactating females 2. Participating in another interventional clinical trial 3. Uncontrolled or untreated cardiovascular disease 4. Central sleep apnoea events (>5/hr) 5. Previous uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) 6. Severe somatic or psychiatric disorders 7. Periodontal disease, temporomandibular

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026