None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
Intermittent hypoxia (pulse oximetry saturation <80%) and bradycardia (pulse rate <80 beats per minute) frequently occur in preterm infants, often associated with apnoea of prematurity. Such episodes of hypoxia and re-oxygenation have the potential to trigger a pro-inflammatory cascade leading to multisystem morbidity including retinopathy of prematurity, impaired growth, longer-term cardiorespiratory instability, and poor neurodevelopmental outcome. Widely used treatments such as methylxanthines and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) are sometimes insufficient and endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are required. Nasal CPAP is the most widely used from of 'non-invasive' ventilation (NIV) in very preterm infants. NIV refers to respiratory support without the need for an endotracheal tube, usually delivered via nasal prongs. Nasal CPAP is an alternative to mechanical ventilation in preterm infants soon after birth. A meta-analysis comparing early CPAP with intubation and mechanical ventilation showed that CPAP reduce the risk of the combined outcome of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). CPAP failure primarily occurs due to AOP, oxygen requirements pre-specified thresholds, and hypercapnia related to hypoventilation. Ventilation failure in infants treated with CPAP may be due to inadequate alveolar ventilation and carbon dioxide elimination. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) delivered via an endotracheal tube leads to excellent carbon dioxide removal using a tidal volume less than the volume of the dead space. HFOV, which has until recently only been delivered via endotracheal tube, uses oscillations of low amplitude and high frequencies quite different from those of normal respiration. It may cause less lung injury than conventional mechanical ventilation. The combination of HFOV and NIV could provide lung-protection, improved oxygenation, better gas exchange, and reduced rates of AOP compared to NIV alone. Therefore, we aim to assess the effect of nHFO versus CPAP therapy in very preterm infants born <30 weeks’ gestation on the cumulative event rate of all bradycardias (< 80 bpm) and desaturations (< 80%) during a 120-minute recording period for each therapy. We hypothesize that in very preterm infants, nHFO is associated with a significant decrease in the number of bradycardias and desaturations compared with CPAP.
Interventions
Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFO) will be delivered using Hudson binasal prongs (Hudson Respiratory Care Inc, Temecula, California, USA) and a Draeger VN500 ventilator (Draeger Medical System, Luebeck, Germany). Babies will be in prone and 15 degrees head-up tilt position. The first 30 minutes of nHFO treatment will be defined as washout period. The subsequent 2-hour period will be used for the primary outcome. After 2.5 hours of nHFO treatment, standard care ventilation (CPAP) will be recommenced. The researcher will stay on the bedside during the whole study time to record handling of the infant and other possible influencing factors. Ventilator settings at the beginning of nHFO: - Frequency: 8 Hz. Will not be changed during the 2-hour treatment period. - Mean airway pressure: Previous set CPAP pressure. Will not be changed during the 2-hour treatment period. - Amplitude: 20 cm H20. Will be adjusted to the smallest amplitude needed for visible chest wall vibration. - Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2): Will be adjusted to maintan oxygen saturation of 91 - 95 percent The duration of the washout period between treatments will be 30 minutes.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
- Gestational age at birth: < 30 weeks - Postmenstrual age: greater than or equal to 26 and < 34 completed weeks of gestation - Postnatal age: > 7 days - Respiratory support: Receiving nasal CPAP and extubated for greater than or equal to 24 hours.
Exclusion criteria
- Participation in another study that prohibits inclusion - Nasal trauma and Pressure Injury score greater than or equal to 2 (stage 2: partial thickness skin loss involving epidermis, dermis or both) before study entry