Skip to content

The OPTIMA-Ex trial: Osteoporosis Prevention Through Impact and Muscle-loading Approaches to Exercise

A comparison of the bone response to impact loading versus resistance training: a randomised controlled trial of upper and lower limb responses in young heathy women with lower than average bone mass.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12616001444471
Acronym
OPTIMA-Ex
Enrollment
51
Registered
2016-10-17
Start date
2016-11-11
Completion date
2018-03-29
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

The skeletal response to exercise is highly dependent on the nature of the activity. The most osteogenic loads are those that induce high magnitude bone strains at high loading rates. However, debate exists as to the predominant source of the adaptive stimulus – muscle forces or gravity-derived impact loads. The determination of the most effective source of loading would provide grounds for optimal exercise prescription for bone health. The aim of this work is to compare the bone response to two known osteogenic loading methods, impact loading exercise versus muscle loading exercise in young women with lower than average bone mass.

Interventions

The study is a three-arm, single blind randomised controlled exercise intervention trial. Eligible participants are randomized to 10-month, twice-weekly, either supervised high intensity resistance training, high intensity impact training or a “sham active” control group. Arm 1 – supervised heavy progressive resistance training. Participants allocated to the resistance training intervention group attend twice-weekly 45 minute instructor-led sessions performed on non-consecutive days. Six co

The study is a three-arm, single blind randomised controlled exercise intervention trial. Eligible participants are randomized to 10-month, twice-weekly, either supervised high intensity resistance training, high intensity impact training or a “sham active” control group. Arm 1 – supervised heavy progressive resistance training. Participants allocated to the resistance training intervention group attend twice-weekly 45 minute instructor-led sessions performed on non-consecutive days. Six compound exercises (deadlift, back squat, bench press, overhead press, bent over row and calf raise) using olympic weights will be completed each session. For each exercise, 5 sets of 3-5 repetitions, corresponding to an intensity of 85 % of 1 repetition maximum will be performed under the supervision of a physiotherapist. Measurements of 1 RM will take place every 12 weeks to ensure sufficient progression of resistance training exercises. Compliance and weight lifted is monitored via training diaries which each participant completes at the end of each session. Arm 2 – supervised high-intensity impact loading exercise. Participants allocated to the impact training intervention group attend twice-weekly 40 minute instructor-led high intensity impact training sessions performed on non-consecutive days. Participants will be taught three fundamental upper limb loading exercises in the form of punches (jab, cross and lead hook) as well as complete three fundamental lower limb impact exercises (jump, hop and drop jump) under the supervision of a physiotherapist. The fundamental exercises will be performed throughout the remainder of the intervention period with progressively increasing height and complexity of jumps and force of landing with participants progressing from shod to barefoot after the familiarisation phase as well as the power and complexity of punching combinations to maintain an RPE of greater than 8 out of 10. Measures of punch kinematics will take place at 2, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 44 weeks using a GymAware device to ensure that participants continue to increase the loading and speed of their punches throughout the training intervention. Compliance is monitored via training diaries which each participant completes at the end of each session.

Sponsors

Griffith University
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Female Apparently healthy With lower than average bone mineral density (hip or spine BMD T-score less than or equal to 0) Unaccustomed to resistance training and impact loading exercise

Exclusion criteria

Musculoskeletal or medical conditions affecting the ability to perform high intensity physical activity, , medications or medical conditions known to effect bone health, cancer, uncontrolled cardiovascular disease, greater than 2 X-ray’s in the past 12 months and current participation in a regular exercise program known to influence bone or previous competitive or regular participation (more than 1 x per week for 1 year or one full season) in resistance training or boxing (including other fight sports and martial arts), gymnastics/dance sports (gymnastics, ballet, aerobics, cheerleading), court sports (volleyball, basketball, netball), ball sports (Australian rules, rugby league/union, soccer, touch) or racquet sports (badminton, squash, tennis) over the past 4 years.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026