Skip to content

Effects of short-term exposure to sound at very high and ultrasonic frequencies at subthreshold levels; a double-blind provocation study.

Effects on sensitive and non-sensitive adults of short-term exposure to sound at very high and ultrasonic frequencies at subthreshold levels; a double-blind provocation study.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12616001410448
Enrollment
40
Registered
2016-10-10
Start date
2017-02-23
Completion date
2017-06-02
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

To measure subjective and objective responses to ultrasound at 20 kHz, at a level which is inaudible to the participant, and to compare these responses to sham exposure (i.e. silence). The participant is informed that ultrasound may or may not be present in each condition, but is unaware of whether ultrasound will be present or absent.. Two groups of participants will be tested. Those who have complained of adverse symptoms in the past which they attribute to high-frequency sound, and adults with no such history of adverse symptoms.

Interventions

The study comprises an initial screening session, a hearing threshold measurement session, and four test conditions. == Asymptomatic participants == The following procedure applies to asymptomatic participants, as identified by questionnaire in the screening session == Hearing threshold level measurement session == In the hearing-threshold measurement session, the hearing threshold level (HTL) of the participant at 20 kHz will be measured using standard psychoacoustic methods with very short bur

The study comprises an initial screening session, a hearing threshold measurement session, and four test conditions. == Asymptomatic participants == The following procedure applies to asymptomatic participants, as identified by questionnaire in the screening session == Hearing threshold level measurement session == In the hearing-threshold measurement session, the hearing threshold level (HTL) of the participant at 20 kHz will be measured using standard psychoacoustic methods with very short bursts of ultrasound (<0.5 sec per presentation). The HTL is required in order to ensure that an inaudible sound can be presented to the participant during the exposure conditions. The maximum sound pressure level used in this measurement will be 105 dB (re 20 microPa). The measurement will be performed in a sound-treated booth using earphones. The level of the sound is that measured at the reference microphone of the appropriate ear simulator according to IEC 60318. The HTL will be re-measured after the test condition to ensure that it has not altered (for example due to changes in earphone placement). If the HTL has reduced by 10 dB or more, then the test session will be deemed invalid, and will be repeated on another day. == Test conditions == Four test conditions will be carried out. Condition A, the “Ultrasound ON” condition: Ultrasound will be presented to the participant; the participant will be told that ultrasound may or may not be present. Condition B, the “Ultrasound OFF” condition: Sham ultrasound (silence) will be presented to the participant; the participant will be told that ultrasound may or may not be present. Condition X and Y; additional information will be displayed to the participant. The comparison of conditions A and B will be used to estimate any genuine effect of ultrasound presence. The details of the four conditions are given below. Condition A, the “Ultrasound ON” condition. The participant will be seated in a sound proof booth with the earphones placed by the tester, and not removed for the duration of the test session (unless requested by the participant). High-frequency sound will be presented to the participant at a frequency of 20 kHz and at a sound-pressure level that is either 88 dB (re 20 microPa) or is 15 dB below the participant's hearing threshold level at 20 kHz, whichever is the lower level. The participant will be exposed for a period of 20 minutes, during which time they will be asked to perform a computer-based visual recognition task, displayed to them via a small screen. Galvanic skin responses will be recorded from electrodes attached to the fingers. After the 20-minutes of exposure, the participant will asked to remain seated for a further 5-minute recovery period. The participant will be asked to complete subjective ratings of the severity of their symptoms relating to the health conditions stated previously. Ratings are performed at three time points: pre-exposure (baseline), immediately following exposure, and at the end of the recovery period. Testing will be postponed if the participant scores higher than “0” (=”no symptoms”) on any of the health conditions in the baseline condition. Condition B, the “Ultrasound OFF” condition. This condition is identical to condition A in all respects except that silence is presented from the loudspeaker. Condition X and Y: These conditions are identical to conditions A and/or B in all respects except that additional information will be displayed to the participant. == Sequence and timing of test conditions == Participants will be randomly allocated to one of four arms, which determines the order in which the four conditions will be conducted: Arm 1: A X B Y Arm 2: A Y B X Arm 3: B X A Y Arm 4: B Y A X Allocation will be by random selection without replacement in blocks of four participants to achieve a counterbalanced design. There will be a maximum of two conditions per day, such that A and B will be separated by approximately 24 hours (at least), and X and Y will also be separated by approximately 24 hours. If two conditions are conducted on one day, there will be a minimum of 2 hours between the end of the first condition and the start of the second. A test condition will be postponed if the participant scores higher than “0” (=”no symptoms”) on any of the health conditions in the baseline condition. == Conducting the test == For all conditions, the sound will be presented from a computer in an observation room adjacent to thesound-treated both. The tester has no influence on the sounds being presented, and no way of telling whether ultrasound is being presented or not in conditions A and B. After starting the software run, the tester inputs the participant number only. The software uses a random number generator to determine which arm the participant is allocated to, and thus whether genuine ultrasound or sham exposure (silence) is presented in any session. The key indicating which participant was allocated to which arm is stored in a coded computer file that is not opened until after the experimental phase of the study has finished, and the statistical analysis has been completed. Conditions X and Y are not blind to the tester as they are able to see the same display as the participant. == Symptomatic participants == For symptomatic participants, the above procedure will be adapted as follows. They will be asked about the time course of the symptoms they have previously experienced. If the estimated onset and recovery time of these allows, then the exposure time and time between test conditions will be reduced. Additional repeats of the set of four conditions will also be conducted.

Sponsors

University of Southampton
Lead SponsorUniversity

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Crossover
Primary purpose
Prevention
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

For participants deemed "sensitive or symptomatic", the participant must have reported adverse reactions which they attribute to ultrasound exposure in the past. For aysmptomatic participants, they must have hearing within normal limits at conventional audiometric frequencies (0,25 - 8 kHz).

Exclusion criteria

1. Severe tinnitus as identified by screening questionnaire 2. Abnormality detected on otoscopy, such as discharge, inflammation, infection, or excessive wax. 3. Contraindications in screening questionnaire such as recent ear infection, current ear pain, or exposure to very loud sounds in the last 24-hours. 4. Excessive intake of caffine in the two hours before the study (e.g. 2 cups of strong coffee) 5. Excessive intake of alcholol withing 24 hours of the study (e.g. more than 2 pints of beer, or two glasses of wine) 6. Colour blindness effecting participants ability to distinguish red, green and blue (which could affect outcomes on the sustained attention task used) 7. Epilepsy (which might be agrivated by the sustained attention task, which has flashing images) 8. Use of recreational drugs in the last week. 9. Strenuous physical or mental activity on the day of the experiment. 10 Hyperacusis experienced for sounds at "conventional" frequencies (< 10 kHz).

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026