Skip to content

Visual images to assist in positioning for spinal and epidural anaesthesia

Usefulness of visual aids in achieving optimal positioning for neuraxial anaesthesia: a randomised trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12616001197426
Acronym
None
Enrollment
85
Registered
2016-08-30
Start date
2014-08-01
Completion date
2016-06-29
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Traditionally, anaesthetists have always been verbally instructing patients how to position themselves for spinal or epidural anaesthesia. This project is based on our hypothesis that if we use images in addition to verbal instructions, the patients could understand easily what is expected of them and therefore they can position themselves appropriately and quickly. We believe this will increase the satisfaction of both anaesthetists and patients with the whole procedure. This project involves randomising patients into two groups, one group gets the standard verbal instructions and the other group gets to see images of the correct position as well. We note the time taken to do a successful procedure, the number of skin punctures made and the satisfaction scores of patients and anaesthetists. The two groups are compared and analysed if showing visual images is any beneficial as opposed to mere verbal instructions.

Interventions

The patients undergoing neuraxial anaesthesia for their hip and knee replacements, were randomised into two groups: The intervention group( Group 2) received standardised verbal instructions along with visual images to assist them to appropriate positioning to enable a spinal block. Following intravenous cannulation and application of standard monitoring, the participants were requested to sit in the upright position on the operating table with their feet resting on a stool, and shoulders gentl

The patients undergoing neuraxial anaesthesia for their hip and knee replacements, were randomised into two groups: The intervention group( Group 2) received standardised verbal instructions along with visual images to assist them to appropriate positioning to enable a spinal block. Following intravenous cannulation and application of standard monitoring, the participants were requested to sit in the upright position on the operating table with their feet resting on a stool, and shoulders gently supported by an assistant. No further assistance in positioning or any verbal prompting was provided by the theatre assistant. No sedative or anxiolytic premedication was administered to the participants, due to possible interference with their comprehension. Anaesthetists were allowed to choose the type, level, and approach of the block, as well as the needle and local anaesthetic used. The anaesthetist prepared the spinal tray and drugs under aseptic conditions, and prepared and draped the patient’s back. A second person started the timer and read out the standardised verbal instructions and showed the visual images (with a model demonstrating one correct and three incorrect positions).The patient then adopted the required position, and the anaesthetist immediately commenced the procedure. A trained independent observer recorded the relevant data.

Sponsors

Usha Gurunathan
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Open (masking not used)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adult patients undergoing elective hip and knee replacements under spinal anaesthesia were eligible for inclusion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria were refusal to consent, inability to read or comprehend English, any contraindication to neuraxial anaesthesia, prior experience with neuraxial blocks, body mass index (BMI) greater than 45 kg/m2, anticipated positioning difficulties due to severe arthritis or major spinal deformities.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026