Skip to content

Evaluation of Ease of Intubation using C-MAC Vs Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients with the Application of Manual Inline Axial Stabilization - A Randomized Comparative Study

Evaluation of the ease of intubation using C-MAC Vs Macintosh Laryngoscope in patients with the application of manual inline axial stabilisation - A randomised trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ANZCTR
Registry ID
ACTRN12616001098426
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-08-12
Start date
2014-08-05
Completion date
2015-04-16
Last updated
2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Brief summary

Airway management in cervical spine injury is complicated ,as the established way of achieving the airway controlby direct laryngoscopy using Macintosh laryngoscope will have distracting injuries on the cervical cord, if there is unstable cervical spine injury. In these cases , it is proven that application of manual in line axial stabilisation (MIAS) will counteract the forces of direct laryngoscopy and reduce the further damage. At the same time MIAS create significant difficulty for laryngoscopy. The idea behind this study was to verify whether simulated difficult airway scenarios , as created in our study by application of MIAS manouvere can be optimally managed with videolaryngoscopy in comparison to conventional direct laryngoscopy

Interventions

CMAC video laryngoscope is having same conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope blade, but with a camera. Essentially it will be indirect view in contrast to direct view by Macintosh Laryngoscope. The laryngoscopy will be done by single experienced( in CMAC) anesthetist of consultant grade Intubation difficulty scale score is recorded . Which reaches higher score if there is change in hands, device or technique. Failed intubation in one technique yield infinite score ( as per Intubation difficicul

CMAC video laryngoscope is having same conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope blade, but with a camera. Essentially it will be indirect view in contrast to direct view by Macintosh Laryngoscope. The laryngoscopy will be done by single experienced( in CMAC) anesthetist of consultant grade Intubation difficulty scale score is recorded . Which reaches higher score if there is change in hands, device or technique. Failed intubation in one technique yield infinite score ( as per Intubation difficiculty scale scoring, 0: difficulty,8 (infinite): impossible to intubate) )and suitable alternative will be employed in securing intubation or ventilation. Manual In line Axial Stabilisation(MIAS) is essentially proven step in preventing the further damage in C-spine injury . A trained anesthetist will be employing MIAS manouvere before intubation attempts.Essentially MIAS involves a trained person stabilizing the head and neck by crouching beside the intubator with hands placed on the patient’s mastoid processes or cradling the occiput giving sufficient counter pressure to prevent neck movements during laryngoscopy.

Sponsors

Shahid Adeel
Lead SponsorIndividual

Study design

Allocation
Randomised controlled trial
Intervention model
Parallel
Primary purpose
Treatment
Masking
Blinded (masking used) (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

patients undergoing general elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation ASA class 1 &2 no predictors of difficult airway

Exclusion criteria

Predictors of difficult airway Chest diseases, Emergency cases previuos Neck surgery

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ANZCTR · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026