None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
The project aims to determine if the two commonly used drug regimens for soft food impactions in the oesophagus are better than placebo for passage of the obstructing bolus. Retrospective data from small and poorly-designed studies have led to the recommendations for the trial of glucagon, glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) or a combination of both in soft food bolus impactions as first line management prior to endoscopy. Retrospective data from a recent audit carried out at Freemantle has demonstrated that the rate of clinical resolution was not appreciably different between patients treated with drugs and patients not treated with drugs and that a strategy of proceeding straight to endoscopy might be preferable In order to definitively answer the question, we propose to prospectively assign patients to either a drug regimen of a) glucagon and GTN or b) placebo and observe the outcomes after 30 minutes after which the pharmacological properties of the drugs excludes a drug effect.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
a. Patients with first presentation of soft food bolus impaction b. Patients above or equal to 18 years old c. Patients capable of furnishing informed consent
Exclusion criteria
a. Known oesophageal malignancy or structural abnormalities b. Previous presentation with soft food bolus oesophageal impaction c. Known allergy or intolerance to glucagon or GTN d. Extrinsic or intrinsic airway compromise e. Oesophageal impaction with inedible or hard foods (e.g. bones, pills, nails) f. Preload dependent cardiovascular physiology (e.g. severe aortic stenosis, hypotension) g. Known insulinoma, pheochromocytoma or glucagonoma