None listed
Conditions
Brief summary
To our knowledge there have been no studies examining problem-solving therapy (PST) specifically in people with diabetic retinopathy (DR), yet from our first study we established that this group face the greatest risk of depression and reduced quality of life (QoL) as well as showing poorer diabetic control compared to those without DR. PST has been shown to be an essential skill for effective diabetes management and effective in reducing diabetes related emotional distress and depressive symptoms. However there is a need for more research that integrates problem-focused and emotion focused interventions in diabetes management. Addressing diabetes specific distress, stress management and healthy coping, some of the key underlying subjective QoL experiences, may improve glycaemic outcomes. This study also would provide novel research specific to those that have ophthalmological diabetic complications. We propose to adopt a PST designed for primary care that teaches problem solving skills and assists individuals with DR to find practical solutions to vision-related and diabetes-related problems. In doing so we anticipate that participants will adopt a more positive problem solving orientation that will hopefully empower them to subsequently improve their psychological well-being. It has been previously established that developing a problem solving pattern and working through individual solutions assists with perpetuating more positive behavioural habit loops. As a result, this intervention may also have knock on effects in improving diabetes self-management behaviours as this has been shown in previous studies. Hypothesis Individuals with diabetic retinopathy who receive tailored problem solving training will show improved quality of life and psychological well-being compared to individuals undergoing usual care. Aim 1: To develop a tailored, problem solving based program that targets individual quality of life difficulties. Aim 2: To assess, using a randomised control trial, the effectiveness of this program in improving participants’ quality of life and psychological well-being (reducing diabetes related distress and depressive symptoms). Investigation will also be undertaken to assess whether enhancing problem solving skills have a direct influence on a participant’s ability to self-manage their diabetes including improving overall glycaemic control and adopting recommended lifestyle practices.
Interventions
Participants randomised to the intervention arm will receive six (minimum) or eight (maximum) complete weekly problem-solving training (PST) sessions provided by trained eye care staff. The first PST session will be combined with the introductory session which will be delivered as an individual one-on-one session (face to face). The remaining PST sessions will be conducted over the telephone and the participant can decide whether they feel they need the 7th and 8th session, which are optional. Between sessions, participants will be expected to attempt to put problem solving techniques into practice and develop goals necessary to fulfill solutions to problems. Progress review will be conducted at the beginning of each session. All telephone calls are recorded and the frequency and duration of each session monitored. Introductory session The introductory session will briefly recap an overview of diabetes with targeted awareness of diabetic retinopathy (DR) risk factors; HbA1c targets, blood pressure, cholesterol, obesity. From here, a discussion on how DR impacts upon a person’s quality of life will be presented. This will followed by explaining the nature of, and rationale behind, PST in the context of diabetes and DR related quality of life (QoL). Participants will be informed of the overall goal of PST which is to present and apply problem solving skills to assist them to live a fuller life despite their DR and the chronic nature of their diabetes. Thus the main goal is to modify the participant’s perceptions and beliefs that may interfere with attempts to engage in optimal problem solving efforts and ultimately optimal self-management practices. An explanation regarding the format and time interval of PST sessions will be discussed. The introductory session will be the gateway to highlighting individual QoL problem areas faced by the participant. Responses from the primary diabetes related QoL questionnaire; the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), will be discussed. Responses from the DDS will form the basis of a ‘problem list’. The problem list will then be used to guide the order in which the participant chooses to address each problem. Discussions around diabetes distress and QoL can be enhanced by use of the “Wheel of Life” which is a method of encouraging discussion around how diabetes affects the main areas of an individual’s life. This approach may assist the PST process by identifying the issues surrounding the problem. The number of problems discussed will be tailored to each participant. Some problems may need more than one session to solve. Each PST session is expected to last around 45 to 60 minutes and will aim to apply the full problem solving technique (discussed below) to address a single problem area per intervention session. Problem Solving Sessions The basis of PST is guiding the participant through a systematic 7 stage process. Briefly, the 7 stages address the following: (Manual available with complete details). 1. Selecting and defining the problem The first step of the PST process is to describe all aspects surrounding the problem such as the ‘when, where, how’ the problem occurs. 2. Set realistic goals The second step is to set a goal orientated around the way the participant would like to see the problem change. 3. Brainstorming Brainstorming involves encouraging the participant to think about as many possible and differing solutions to the problem. 4. Pros and Cons The participant is facilitated to consider the pros (advantages) and cons (disadvantages) for each possible solution that is reported. This process involves considering the impact of potential obstacles and barriers to achieving solutions, for example the influence of time, money and family support. 5. Choose the most feasible solution The participant is facilitated to choose the most appropriate and appealing solution/s to the problem. 6. Determine a plan of action Once a solution/s is selected, a plan entailing all the individual steps to achieving the solution is constructed with the participant. This includes the ‘who, what, when and how’ details in carrying out a series of actions leading to resolving the problem. For example, what specifically needs to done, how frequently, how often and how practices can be weaved into the participant’s routines and lifestyle. 7. Evaluate the outcome at next visit A review of a participant’s adoption of problem solving techniques and skills is required at this step. This is combined with consideration of how PST has worked for individual problems and whether ongoing attention is required in certain areas, whether this be related to the actual problem itself or in the action plan surrounding goal setting, needs refinement.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
*Type 2 diabetes – on oral medication and/or insulin *Evidence of diabetic retinopathy *Self-reported difficulties on the Diabetes Distress Scale (an overall score greater than or equal to 3 indicates distress) *English speaking *Able to give written informed consent *No cognitive impairment as measured by the 6CIT
Exclusion criteria
*Type 1 diabetes *No evidence of diabetic retinopathy *Self-reported difficulties on the Diabetes Distress Scale (overall score <2.0 *Non-English speaking *Unable to give written informed consent *Cognitive impairment as measured by the 6CIT